View more about Gattaca reviews
A literary film in a sci-fi skin is an insult to science-fiction, especially when the skin is full of holes!
Daniela 2022-03-22 09:01:14
Maybe I'm superficial, but I think science fiction is an imagination of the future. This imagination can include not only technology, but also humanities, ethics, and technology in the future. Science fiction is rigorous and logical, but I can't see it in this film. Any rigor, and no logic can be seen. Please tell me why the era when you can customize genes can't cure simple sports injuries. Have you seen the era when you can build trains but can't repair carriages? The era of targeted selection of genes, but unable to detect genes, and unable to record genes, any passer-by can impersonate, I can't complain about this, and there are fake sets full of whole films, forget it, I don't want to say more. . Please, no matter what connotation, meaning or pursuit you have, you must always remember that you are making a sci-fi film, and you must show some sci-fi spirit! The future may be stormy or sunny, but it will never return to the level of technology in the 1970s. Movies in the 1990s, like those made in the 1940s, you can pay tribute to the humanities, but you must not insult science fiction. My feeling is that I am watching a sci-fi film in the 1940s, please let the director go to a literary film in the future, sci-fi is not for you
Extended Reading
-
[last lines]
Vincent: [voiceover] For someone who was never meant for this world, I must confess I'm suddenly having a hard time leaving it. Of course, they say every atom in our bodies was once part of a star. Maybe I'm not leaving... maybe I'm going home.
-
Vincent: Is the only way you can succeed is to see me fail?