"Tomorrowland": The world doesn't match

As director Brad Bird's second live-action film, it uses science fiction elements to create a semi-real and semi-unreal two-dimensional sci-fi film, but the film uses the little girl as the protagonist of saving the future world, highlighting the child's rescue The theme of the world, which also dooms the movie to be marginalized and become a heroic movie that is difficult to be taken seriously. It does not mean that children cannot be heroes who save the world, but the movie is destined to be intended to refer to a specific face. The audience, which makes people despise and pretentiously the feeling of watching movies, and makes the feeling stay in a specific movie that is only for teenage audiences. Obviously, director Brad Bird also intentionally or unintentionally embodies the elements of animated films in the film, which also deepens the tendency of children's works in the film, aggravates the expression of non-seriousness in the work, and leads the film to a new direction. This kind of development is full of innocence and innocence, but this kind of development seems out of place in an adult film, and the narrative of the film's plot, which is interlaced in time and space, makes the story more delusional in terms of genre, so we can't help but feel that the film is to reflect the wisdom of young people. Such a story of adventure and adventure, coupled with the director's choice of George Clooney to play the first male lead, the eccentric and feminine image interpreted by the film made the movie feel quite weird. George Clooney really Not suitable to play a Frankenstein, no matter how hard he tries to show the scientist's eccentricities, he still can't hide the flaws that he can't handle this role.

The director uses a rather open way to narrate this seemingly complicated story. The multi-line narrative is intertwined in time and space, and it creates a complex, incomprehensible and open-minded story. The story seems simple but is actually jerky and difficult. I understand, if I really want to figure out the principle inside, I have to work hard. As a film full of unrestrained imagination, it can be seen that the director combined the experience of shooting "Mission Impossible 4" to add a lot of cool shots to the film, and created the atmosphere like a spy movie. It also deepens the plot of the story to release a kind of effect like looking at flowers in the fog. The director shows as many details as possible in the film, so that the film presents a real and elegant texture, and vividly and realistically describes the fantasy of the future technological society, creating a real and credible vision for us It is a spectacle, and the director also tried to add a touch of comedy to the film, but unfortunately the film did not portray a plot that made us feel ridiculous and fun, but the overly serious expression filled the film with a sense of depression, which is in line with what the film is about to present. The results are quite different. In general, the movie has a clear and clear story line, but it is confused and misled by the various expressions added by the director in the narration, thus presenting a messy and unintelligible confusion. The diversified description of the movie really makes We have seen a lot of interesting things. Just thinking about the various relationships, it still makes people feel that the form is greater than the meaning. It cannot be said that the movie is not good, but it is too fancy. To guide the plot in the opposite direction, I have to say that such a character plot setting is still too avant-garde, which is a bit unacceptable.

The movie's creativity is very good. With director Brad Bird's delicate and delicate shooting techniques, it presents a kind of beauty in the future of technology, and the movie also has a considerable amount of anime-style plot descriptions, but it is performed by real actors. It seems very exaggerated and unnatural when it comes out. If the film can be made into an animated film, I think the plot will become much better. As a director Brad Bird who is an animated film, this kind of The choice of the subject matter to make a live-action movie can prove how much the director wants to show his control over the live-action movie. It is a pity that the live actors selected by the director cannot perform colorful and delicate expressions and movements, which instantly makes the movie eclipsed. Not a lot.

As a movie starring George Clooney, it always makes people feel that he is really unsuitable to play a commercial giant. The feeling he gives is always a gentle and perfect man, and he cannot really express and interpret the alternative and flawed It is the flaw in the character's sense that makes his performance in this movie look very bad, no matter how much he wants to break through himself, it always makes people feel a little powerless, but his warm male image It is too deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, but it is impossible to control some characters with strong emotions. And the performance of the heroine Brittney Robertson is even more lackluster. From the beginning to the end, she has an expression in the movie, a worried look, and she feels that the whole world owes her so that people can't find her. It is the shadow of a little scientist. On the contrary, Rafi Cassidy, who plays Athena in the movie, has a dazzling performance. The leisurely in front of the camera shows a strong sense of camera and control, with a pair of eyes. The big flowing eyes, looking at you affectionately from time to time, feel that she is about to be moved by her gaze.

View more about Tomorrowland reviews