Later, after I went to the cinema and watched "Tomorrowland", a dialogue with the children suddenly emerged, which made me I began to think about whether the film still has some meanings and connotations that are not completely what everyone sees now.
First of all, I have to admit that I very much agree with the point of view of a nine-year-old. The reason is: the
film is really not future, because it is Regarding "tomorrow", not "future", the two belong to different concepts. We always feel that "future" has little to do with us and is out of reach; basically, it only represents three vague passages on the trajectory of time One: past, present and future. Relatively speaking, "tomorrow" represents the time and space that we will inevitably and soon enter, and what will be loaded is absolutely relevant to our current attitudes and behaviors. In this way, in the film The last paragraph describes the indictment that human beings do not care about future disasters at all, even though the signs are everywhere, it has a great connection with the concept of "tomorrow" rather than "future".
At the same time, the film is indeed not sci-fi enough, and there is no sharp weapon. , and lacks imaginative science and technology to deal with bad guys who destroy the earth or the universe (I think many people feel that the story is dull because of this). A little creative idea beyond imagination, maybe only the Eiffel Tower can be divided into it. Second, it turned into a rocket and could actually lift off. However, from the perspective of the storyline, it is not inappropriate or even reasonable that the film is not too sci-fi, because the so-called Tomorrowland originally appeared at the same time as the real world. Two parallel spaces have no precedence relationship, that is, the world of tomorrow is the state of the world after development or evolution.
Because of this, the difference between the two worlds is not necessarily that one has advanced technology, so there is no need to use sci-fi elements to highlight the difference. What the movie wants to emphasize is that the only difference between the two co-existing spaces is that in the world of tomorrow, everyone worked together to avoid all possible human disasters, and they chose to be everyone who will still be there tomorrow, for the sake of tomorrow. The Earth that still exists makes changes. This should be the reason why we yearn to move to another parallel time and space, not because of high-end scientific development, or the future technology that we are trying our best to explore in the present. In this way, it turns out that high-end technology and sci-fi stunts are not the protagonists of this movie at all.
As for the reason why children can't read the film, it can be explained simply by the fact that the film does not have clear good and bad people, but only the characters of pessimism and optimism. The heroine is the head of the optimism, and she will rush forward when she encounters any obstacle, while the hero is a stubborn pessimist who has experienced from dreams to hopes to disappointments.
Further analysis, the film does not actually use children as the main audience. For them, the world is already beautiful (of course, before they have too many sad experiences, or see despair or terrible scenes like the destruction of the earth), the film shows that the world needs hope and dreams. , to work hard for everyone's tomorrow, etc. For children, when there is no contrast or too much external interference, there is no need for movies to specifically "tell" them, because these are the All have a view.
Because of the simple and intuitive feelings and expressions of nine-year-old children, there is another interpretation of this film. It is precisely because of the state and attitude of the children that the film finally gives the children the task of finding dreamers lurking in all walks of life who can bring about change.
In addition to "future" belonging to our "future masters", "tomorrow" should use their vision and perspective to discover endless possibilities, act for the purest desire, and make dreams no longer stay in dreams.
Gentlemen, do you understand?
The article was first published on the public account "One-One Path".
View more about Tomorrowland reviews
