It's almost these tags.
What's interesting is that the line of love is completely abandoned, should it be considered bold? There are pros and cons. The advantage is that the audience’s attention is concentrated, and they can basically follow the main line of thrillers and puzzle solving. The disadvantage is that changing the heroine to a male has no effect on the plot-it’s a bit wrong.
It is said that there is telepathy between the male lead and the female lead in the original novel. At the same time, there is still no line of love in the original novel. What is it? What else does telepathy do? what to do? what to do?
It was a trick to save effort, I think. And timid. Is it self-knowledge from another angle? whatever.
A proposition is: Is long-term pain really worse than short-term pain?
It takes courage to change the status quo, so there may not be anything wrong with what the paranoid brother who is labeled as a villain in the play is not wrong-the protagonist changes the status quo, and the paranoid brother is dead. There is a causal relationship among them.
But we always appreciate the initiative. Because in reality we are often passive.
There is no big scene. The monsters are just a few spiders. Although the design of the mobile maze is remarkable, it is nothing surprising compared with the "Panic Fang"-but if you say that it is particularly bad, it is not enough. .
It is an extremely mediocre work.
View more about The Maze Runner reviews
