I think that adaptations with prototypes should have at least respect for the characters, and should not design some demonized images that are completely out of reason in order to increase drama contradictions, such as political commissars in the play. In all fairness, some people really think that the following character trajectory Is the logic reasonable?
In the siege of the city where ammunition was exhausted, a comrade political commissar abused his position to slander his comrade-in-arms as a national thief because a comrade-in-arms whom he had known for a while and had no interest in him liked his comrade-in-arms (I am curious if he discovered the existence of NTR, and he What would happen if the woman took the initiative), after the heroine was shot, the life and death of the heroine were uncertain, and this political commissar who always felt that his life was more valuable simply turned into the enemy's experience points to help the NTR men level up?
It's obviously a good subject, and it also has a near-perfect opening. What I want to see next is realistic characterization and the fate of people in the war. This does not mean that the script should be written like our country's. The main theme film, but now the script reveals this style between the lines: the bad guys act without thinking and without reason. Oh no, he seems to have a lot of hormones left!
PS: The
sniper scene is still very exciting.
View more about Enemy at the Gates reviews
