For the first half hour of watching this movie, I was a little disappointed, thinking that the second part was just pure dirty jokes and low-level jokes. Until they came up with the idea of raising children and extended to the topic of human rights, I think the idea of this film was instantly improved, from the innocent topic of "Teddy Bear has life" to a social issue. While teddy bears are defending their rights, we can't help but think of homosexuality, early slavery and other controversial issues. There is one detail that Ted did not express any dissatisfaction with his wife after learning about her drug abuse when she was young, and did not dwell on her past. It may be that the Chinese and American cultures are different, but this is commendable in my opinion.
In terms of shooting techniques, soundtrack, etc., there is no major criticism of this film. In the part of the court defense, as someone who has been involved in the debate, I think the character defense, question and answer, etc. are still very well designed. (Although I thought it was strange at first why the heroine didn't start directly from the definition of "person", but in the end, lawyer Meghan won the case.) The point I want to complain the most is that the first part is Ted's life and death crisis, and the second part is The male protagonist's life and death crisis (it's a bit nonsense to easily survive), if we want to make the third part, is it two people's lives hanging by a thread?
View more about
Ted 2 reviews