The creativity of the movie is very good. To be honest, the movie seems to reveal some facts in the real society, but the movie is expressed in a colder way. People will not only pay for their own efforts and time, but also life (and Isn't it the same in real life that is giving life? It's just that there is no timer for the passing of time). Some people say that if one day people do not even have the most basic rights to survive (just like in a movie, some people can live forever, but others cannot), society will collapse. I can only say that everything is one degree. The question is, when medicine is so advanced today, who can say that the right to life is equal now? The upper class can get better medical and nutritional protection, while the lower class can only wait for death when a disease strikes.
The plot design of the movie is a bit simple, lacks a more in-depth description, and the conflict performance is not obvious. A lot of plots are placed on the struggle between the guardian of time and the protagonist, but they are not the main body of contradiction. So on the whole, the movie lacks exciting aspects in the plot. Perhaps this should be the biggest shortcoming of this movie. Such a good idea feels a bit wasted.
View more about
In Time reviews
