The third part of the series, although one is not as good as one, it is still a big blockbuster, it is worth watching, but it is not as good as the previous one!
Recommendation index: ★★★☆ (7.5/10 points)
View more about Jurassic Park III reviews
A series of works that are getting worse
Wava 2022-03-20 09:01:15
In 2001, "Jurassic Park 3", although the time is similar to the previous ones, there is not much progress in technology, this time there are more pterosaurs. . Although it is logically almost meaning. . The big birdcage is really enough. . There is even more controversial Spinosaurus and Tyrannosaurus rex, all for the purpose of attracting attention with arguments. . Are you afraid that everyone is tired of the aesthetics of Tyrannosaurus rex?
The third part of the series, although one is not as good as one, it is still a big blockbuster, it is worth watching, but it is not as good as the previous one!
Recommendation index: ★★★☆ (7.5/10 points)
The third part of the series, although one is not as good as one, it is still a big blockbuster, it is worth watching, but it is not as good as the previous one!
Recommendation index: ★★★☆ (7.5/10 points)
Extended Reading
-
Dr. Grant: Did you read Malcolm's book?
[Erik nods]
Dr. Grant: So?
Erik: I don't know. It was kinda preachy. And too much Chaos. Everything Chaos. It just seemed like the guy was high on himself.
Dr. Grant: That's two things we have in common.
-
Billy Brennan: So Mr. Kirby, when you climbed K2, did you base camp at twenty-five or thirty thousand feet?
Paul Kirby: Thirty thousand feet, we were pretty close to the top.
Billy Brennan: You were about a thousand feet above, actually.