A series of works that are getting worse

Wava 2022-03-20 09:01:15

In 2001, "Jurassic Park 3", although the time is similar to the previous ones, there is not much progress in technology, this time there are more pterosaurs. . Although it is logically almost meaning. . The big birdcage is really enough. . There is even more controversial Spinosaurus and Tyrannosaurus rex, all for the purpose of attracting attention with arguments. . Are you afraid that everyone is tired of the aesthetics of Tyrannosaurus rex?
The third part of the series, although one is not as good as one, it is still a big blockbuster, it is worth watching, but it is not as good as the previous one!
Recommendation index: ★★★☆ (7.5/10 points)

View more about Jurassic Park III reviews

Extended Reading
  • Virgil 2022-03-19 09:01:03

    So stupid, so stupid! Everywhere is full of perfunctory and randomness. Compared with the amazing first part, it is a drastic step backward, and even uglier than the second part, and the classic soundtrack can resonate a little bit. Also, I seriously suspect that the heroine was played by Brother Tom, it looks so special (funny face)...

  • Alejandrin 2022-04-24 07:01:02

    It's boring, I admire that phone. It can still be loud when pulled out of the dinosaur's stomach and put into the feces, and it is also waterproof, rainproof and lightningproof. Really Nb!

Jurassic Park III quotes

  • Dr. Grant: Did you read Malcolm's book?

    [Erik nods]

    Dr. Grant: So?

    Erik: I don't know. It was kinda preachy. And too much Chaos. Everything Chaos. It just seemed like the guy was high on himself.

    Dr. Grant: That's two things we have in common.

  • Billy Brennan: So Mr. Kirby, when you climbed K2, did you base camp at twenty-five or thirty thousand feet?

    Paul Kirby: Thirty thousand feet, we were pretty close to the top.

    Billy Brennan: You were about a thousand feet above, actually.