There are three original works of "The Hunger Games". I don't know when it started. The last film of the original change must be split into two for release. Good or bad. In order to earn an extra box office? Also in order to make the original work better interpretation.
Always believe that "The Hunger Games" is a film with the pursuit of freedom as the main line, the rebels represented by Katniss, not only to overthrow the oppressive dictatorship in the capital, but also to pursue pure freedom-even if there is no capital, no more Being oppressed by any government, for self, for everyone, to redeem.
Mockingbird (Part 1) paved the way for the performance of the lower part. Katniss called the spiritual symbol of the thirteenth district. He declared war on President Snow in the capital and saved Pitta, who had been thinking about it day and night. But what is the truth? Whether or not to destroy the capital can be exchanged for permanent peace. The human mind is the most unfathomable subject, war is about to start, and the road to freedom has just begun.
View more about The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 reviews
