let’s complain about some bugs first: 1. The leaders of various countries ordered the release of CW7. There is no preparation for the world to enter the ice age. In the end, a private entrepreneur turned out to be a savior by mistake;
2. This polar bear can survive, indicating that human technology is sufficient to withstand such a low temperature. The people at the South and North Pole Research Station did not even survive. There is no cold protection equipment on such an advanced train;
3. Such a high-flying train needs manpower to remove waste materials;
4. The argument that the train is driven by a perpetual motion machine is totally unacceptable to me. There is a secret saying that nuclear fusion is OK. But a private entrepreneurs are engaged in controlled nuclear fusion came out, the European Union, the United States put forward a Earth III, IV Earth every minute response to the crisis is not a thing;
5. a person obviously be hit seriously injured, suddenly full of blood resurrection burst Kind of, you tell me this is not shooting the second dimension;
6. Cockroaches can be regarded as first-time consumers, from the energy point of view, it should be better than sweet potatoes. Choosing cockroaches is purely disgusting;
7. There is only one exit for the whole car... How did it get up;
8. It's weird that the two children survived when they went out.
- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -
a good start into the topic, set aside time to scientific problems. Discuss what the director throws about society and systems. Various metaphors, reflections and irony of balance and revolution. But let’s take a look at the bugs in this area first:
1. The people at the end are useless at all. If the child is a child, the captain will hire a few more women and it will be over;
2. Since those people are useless, they are raised. They provoke them to rebel and kill a group of people every few years. Not only idle to the point of pain, but also very abnormal;
3. Let me say, it's really hard for you to find such a less exploited place on the train in the world. Especially those who rioted have no production or labor at all.
—— · —— · —— · —— · —— · —— · —— · —— · —— · —— · ——
Putting aside all of this, follow the director completely, and finally you can really enter the text . This drama mainly talks about the people in power who instigated some people at the bottom to make a revolution in order to achieve the purpose of controlling the number of people. Do not consider the use of revolution by the captain. This revolution is a complete joke, and probably the director also used this as a means to reflect on and satirize a certain revolution and revolutionary mood. First, there is no bargaining chip. After all, they have no production, no service, no labor, and eat and drink for nothing. So the male protagonist thought about creating conditions to control the fresh water. After discovering that the controlled fresh water was only for themselves, they reached the front of the car in a rage. Generally speaking, the revolution can only succeed when it represents more advanced productive forces, production relations, or when there is serious exploitation; second, it is committed downright. There is no leadership or leadership from the middle class or the elite. Front-line workers can play a certain right to speak because of their participation in actual production. And this can be used by the upper-middle class who control capital and the means of production to seek a bigger pie and carry out new distribution of benefits. It is very difficult for the downright people to win the revolution. Third, a revolution that only destroys and does not care about construction can only be a failed revolution anyway. The system is irrational, and reforms, reforms, and even revolutions are all possible. But at least it needs to be replaced by an immature new system instead of anarchic chaos. The original intention of the "Curtis Revolution" was "milk bread fairness". This was the naive goal of many revolutions at the beginning, but the "Curtis Revolution" has no more. In terms of the result, there is almost no other possibility of worse, and the result is completely contrary to the original intention. A revolution that is not aimed at construction can only be disorderly destruction and can only bring about serious disasters; the fourth reason is improper. Except for a few parents, the revolutionary masses almost simply want a better life. Hey, you eat and drink for nothing, and you just have to make a revolution. It's impossible to justify killing so many people.
I do not deny and do not oppose the revolution. On the contrary, I sympathize, approve, and support the revolution. But have conditions. It is in line with the development of productive forces, supported by the working people of the city, led by rising or advanced interest groups, and has construction goals and programs. Otherwise, judging from the results, it is almost all violent turbulence.
From this perspective, the director is a good lesson for a part of people with high revolutionary sentiments. In the revolution, the keyboard man can't fly to the sky, nor can it be that angry youths win a fight. In my opinion, the setting that the captain uses the revolution to achieve balance is set by God. The commander's philosophy has always been balance. From the perspective of the middle and front parts of the carriage, the concept of balance has been implemented well, with each performing its own duties. But population is still a problem, so the driver waved his hand to incite revolution, greatly reducing the number of passengers and maintaining the balance. But the male protagonist desperately wants to break this balance and redefine a balance that he believes is a greater fair number of people. The male protagonist was about to successfully destroy this balance for a while, but Andy kept the old balance at stake. This is still related to the above question, whether a balance should be replaced and overthrown, and correspondingly, it should be based on whether the revolution should be carried out. The revolution on the train is unconditional.
When the train derailed, the two men protected the last fire of mankind, leaving behind a man and a woman like Adam and Eve. This is of course extremely symbolic. Probably there is a way out, with the power of human beings, believing in the power of humans, breaking the old and creating the new, which means breaking new ground. The director boldly set the time for 2014, which means to be always vigilant. At the end, there is an optimistic spirit that praises mankind and believes that mankind can overcome suffering.
View more about Snowpiercer reviews
