How should I put it, the first one still looks pretty normal and can't be said to be great, but as a fantasy movie, the Cinderella-style idea used still looks very childish.
Well, at least if I'm still a primary school student, it's really pretty.
However, with the enrichment of film reading experience, I really feel that it is nothing. I am not talking about new ideas, but about the content of the story and the dialogue of the characters.
These two films are still good as museum promotional films, but they are nothing as movies.
Insufficient nutrition and insufficient taste.
The methods used when trying to express reason are extremely blunt.
Of course, the above evaluation is more for the first part.
As for the second film, well, it was probably shot for those tables and chairs in the cinema, and it is estimated that the tables and chairs would fall asleep less than half of them.
bad movie? Oh, how can you say that? !
To actually insult the two sacred words "bad film" like this! ! !
View more about Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian reviews
