1. Plot: After reading other comments, they are basically criticisms of the plot. Well, the reason is that it turns out to be too vulgar. In fact, the screenwriter has already made the best choice within the narrow space of possibilities, so I really shouldn't be blamed anymore. The analysis is as follows:
"Tremor Space" was released in 2005, but under the influence of the 9/11 incident in 2001, sensitive political and ethnic topics related to hijacking were limited. The so-called restriction does not mean that there is "the US State Administration of Radio, Film and Television" interfering with the subject matter, but that after a major terrorist attack, the American people generally may not yet calm down. In order to avoid hurting the audience's emotions, American filmmakers dare not It is easy to step over the "humane" thunder pool (harming the audience is equal to murdering the box office). In this case, the hijacking can only be made for money, which can be summarized in this film as "black-hearted marshals colluded with brainless flight attendants, blamed single mother engineers, and conspired to defraud 50 million US dollars".
2. Director: As a low-end movie fan who has watched a lot of films, but still knows little about imaging techniques such as the use of lenses, my evaluation criteria for the level of the director is quite subjective: tight rhythm, clear narrative, and smooth emotion. According to this standard, Rob Reiner's "Walk With Me" is better than Ang Lee's "Brokeback Mountain" (don't get me wrong, I am also a fan of An Dao, and I like his "Food Man and Woman" and "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon") .
Back to the main story, as a thriller and suspense film, the director of this film has done a good job in mastering the rhythm and creating the atmosphere, and the level of control is comparable to that of "Beautiful Flight" with a similar theme. It belongs to 90 minutes to tell the story. I appreciate the clear type. There is no deliberate suspense for the sake of suspense, and the tense atmosphere is rendered more natural. This kind of film is more in line with the needs of modern audiences.
3. Actor: Consistent with everyone's opinion, Jodie Foster's acting is highly praised. Jodie Foster is a special actress - intelligent but not as flamboyant and outspoken as Sharon Stone to get in trouble, on the contrary, she is notoriously tight-lipped (see her Golden Globes coming out remarks); She became famous at a young age and her works still have the aura of those years. In my opinion, the role she is best at interpreting is a heroine who is strong on the outside and stronger on the inside. She is firm and brave in the face of bad guys, and she will never be soft-hearted. Although such roles generally appear in some monotonous genre films, it is undeniable that such images were very popular from the 1990s to the early 2000s when female consciousness was rising. Based on her acting experience and directing experience, it is always easy to associate her with another senior who played and directed - Clint Eastwood. Although Judy isn't from Texas, her admirable cowboy spirit of unyielding denial is truly pure blood. I heard that she has retired, and I hope her directorial work will bring more surprises to the audience.
View more about Flightplan reviews
