First of all, I think there is a big bug, and that is the process of changing their faces. It should be the same face, after all, this is the title. The eyes are exactly the same, well, maybe they are the same color originally, or they are wearing more high-tech things like cosmetic contact lenses. The peat teeth are exactly the same, well, this is a detail that can be said to be a bug or can be ignored, otherwise how to act.
I have never seen Cage's "sorrowful" image. As far as I am concerned, there are not many Cage movies I have seen, which is not enough to have a comprehensive review. It’s different from the kind of boring American-style courage in the national treasures. There is a kind of hero who wants to lead the people of the world to achieve peace and liberation. It’s also different from the melancholy, sentimental and slightly feminine. The image of the affectionate long-legged angel in the city of angels, the arrogant, evil, and sly image in the opening of the film really makes me unable to help me shine. The equipment in that small box is really shining gold, little red shirt, burgundy (I don't know how to describe that color) suit, molesting beautiful women, I go, it still feels so bad. However, I was a little disappointed that it actually hung up so soon. But in the middle of the details, while holding the archer, he wanted to preempt and kneel down after he failed. A series of actions were completed in one go. I just wanted to say, good acting. Then okay, I’m too young too simple, how could I hang up so soon, and suddenly I sit up from the bed, I still think it’s quite ridiculous, another bug, how could there be no one watching such important people, and what? Maybe the physical strength is so good. I think the acting skills after that are more regular, not average, but good acting, but it can only be said to be consistent with his personal style. As long as he is not deliberately irritable, silent, and melancholy, that typical Cage image will return.
Let's talk about John Travolta, honestly for the first time knowing such a person. The positive image is good, the negative image is even better. The acting skills are really awesome. Once I was turned into a villain by Troy, that tone, tone, and body language felt like Troy. And after watching the plot, I think of the warm scene when Archer and Michael play the carousel together at the beginning of the film, and the image of a loving father continues to deepen.
I think the plot is great. The role of archer is really a positive character. He has never forgotten his son who died because of him. He is burdened with the responsibility of avenging his son to hunt Troy. The glorious image was already there the moment he accepted that mission. In the middle, when he arrived at Troy's lair and learned that his enemy's son was right in front of him, Cage acted a little bit hesitantly, whether or not to kill him. But the archer, who is kind in heart, stays sober even with such deep hatred, will not hurt the innocent, and has a glorious image. There is another plot. When Jamie was almost raped by her boyfriend, Troy came out to save her. At that moment, no matter what he thought, he actually felt that Troy was not that annoying. I always think that the plot depicting the other side of a villain is great. Of course, I don’t know what the plot of this film is meant to express. It’s great that the knife Troy gave Jamie became his own deadly dagger. The details echo very nicely.
In fact, I think the most ingenious thing about the plot is to allow Archer to confront his colleagues in the process of hiding in prison. In this process, Archer’s psychology is very complicated. He must always be free to protect and fight against himself. Between colleagues. (There is another bug, I feel that Buzz in the middle is here to fight soy sauce) The confrontation in Troy's nest is the most classic. The slow fight in the soft music in the middle is very visually beautiful. And in the process of confrontation, you no longer know that the square is the square. Perhaps the righteous side lies in the justice of the leader? I don't know, anyway, when I watched it, I thought those bad guys were also good.
The two supporting characters are very successful. The first one is Pollux, who is extremely smart and neurotic. Although the film does not explain what he eats and why he takes medicine at the end of the film, his presence has played a big role in the portrayal of Troy. It's hard to say what the details of tying shoelaces should convey. The second one is sasha. The classic is the so-called details of his son's education. She is a warm and heroic woman.
A good movie, a good action movie, so many praises for Wu Yusen.
View more about Face/Off reviews
