A bunch of hard wounds, the main theme of USA, Reivew on Jarhead 2: Field of Fire

I watched half of it and couldn't stand it anymore. Why not use two well-armed pickups in the poppy field? The seal touched the back of the sniper, why not use a pistol? (I thought there was no pistol, but the seal even took out a pistol to fight once.) When the convoy was attacked and twice in the village house, the RPG was seen and warned in advance, and the personnel were also evacuated. Why didn't they fight for so long? Drop the RPG hand? Since we don't plan to capture armed pickups, why not give priority to using 40mm grenades? The pickup stopped and the occupants got out of the car, so why not kill the machine gunner first? The Taliban entered the house and seized the "goods", why didn't they drive out the US troops and kill them all? The most difficult thing to understand is why the convoy started with an armed and armored pickup sandwiched by an unarmed truck, two unarmed trucks, or a single driver, the lead car and the tail car, which is more important? Who will protect whom? I really don't know how to write death?

It's a bad movie, it's too main theme, and it basically competes with the anti-Japanese drama of the Chinese Dynasty. And absolutely follow the unspoken rules of American films, there are whites, there are blacks, there are Asians, there are women. Don't watch it if you haven't seen it, it's completely incomparable with the first pot cover.

View more about Jarhead 2: Field of Fire reviews

Jarhead 2: Field of Fire pictures