It is well known that robots have played a major role in human society so far. Robots go up to the ground and go to the ground, and the robots complete the boring and rigid work on the production line. . . . However, in the future human society, whether robots can really replace some of human's jobs that are not completely 'mechanical', such as law enforcement, is indeed an interesting topic. Judging from the technology and imagination currently possessed by human beings, the answer to this question is not optimistic. This film, like its predecessors, has exciting results, shocking consequences...,so, the conclusion given is also negative. The makers of these films share the views of the senator, played by Zach Grenier, which is no coincidence, but a reflection of public opinion or mainstream opinion. I, too, don't see the day when my descendants will be dealing with robot cops on the street.
Personally, I think that Samuel L. Jackson's role in the film is the most brilliant, and he threaded the needle many times, making the plot progress smoothly. Especially at the end of the credits, the two swear words were blocked, haha, impressive. It is no wonder that the crime rate has dropped sharply, and the social stability situation is very good. Who doesn't like this? Just because of a little accident, the loss of a person's happiness or life, to deny the entire robot police project, can people be outraged?
However, to the gratification of these robot police fans, overseas, robot police are still very powerful. In view of the fact that the project factory in the film is in China, it is suggested that good people can make a sequel. The plot focuses on the introduction of the technology after China learned that Washington denied the robot police project, so that the project took root and blossomed in China. There are already living examples of this plot in reality, such as some of Cisco's Internet technologies.
View more about RoboCop reviews
