When I wake up, I become a robot. No one can accept it. Although everyone has great power, how can ordinary people imagine the feeling of losing a limb? But the film does not continue to make a fuss about the identity of the robot, such as rebuilding the relationship with the family, but after meeting his wife and children hastily, he immediately begins an individualistic heroic journey against the combination of power and capital .
After reducing dopamine, he has become a robot. There is no conflict between humans and machines. He is just one of the many robots in Omuler. It is very scary. Although it is a weapon for law enforcement, his wife and children is always looking for someone. It was only after he gradually regained his dopamine through his wife that he discovered the case against himself. His first thought was revenge, finding his enemies, not comforting his wife and children. The fight in the dark night seemed a bit too fake. After all, the opponent's bullets were real, and he was not seriously injured. After solving this group of drug dealers, he solved the scourge of the police station one after another. But the interrogation by remote control came to an abrupt end. Mechanical equipment endows him with infinite information processing capabilities, but this in turn is very detrimental to his designers. The designer is only there to make money, not for the law. Is this robot different from other robots? Does it have its own independent computing and reasoning capabilities, can it find new criminal clues?
Later, when he woke up again, it was only through the doctor that he learned of the conspiracy of his murder. He also thought of arresting the president on suspicion of murdering a police officer. It turned out that the boss of his own company was the one who had contact with the Drug Dealer Police Department and even the Senate. He must kill him. This is the passionate influence of his case handling, not the procedural setting, but instead of exposing him through legal proceedings or the media, he captures him. The shootout was also great.
That is to say, after restoring dopamine, the person discovered his case, and then followed the case to find his boss. Dopamine is here only to break the grip of others, including reluctant scientists. As for how to get along with people as a robot, it remains to be explored. So the second part must be the story of their family.
The whole story is completely similar to the idea of Avatar. A police officer who received a transformation, then discovered a conspiracy on his side, and scientists with conscience cooperated with him, and finally destroyed this huge technology capital and power group. The brilliance of the entire design fight is not inferior. It's a black installation, but the protagonist's performance through his eyes can still move people's hearts.
As for the issues discussed by the entire media, whether robots have the right to kill has nothing to do with this film. Pulling out a person to face the audience alone, or even holding a debate, does not deepen the film's thinking on robot killing, and it is just a touch of the water. If you want to exaggerate a public opinion war in the United States, it will be too much. too simple. I think robots can't kill people, or they can be set to arrest criminals, and criminals can be set to kill if they deserve the death penalty. This can be solved without involving this ethical issue. Of course, robots do not have the right to kill. Using robots is very dangerous. It gives them the right to kill. What if they kill the wrong person? Who is responsible? The robot itself has no consciousness and cannot go to jail. At most, give them an electric baton, anaesthetize the person, and notify the police. Give the robots weapons and let them kill,
View more about RoboCop reviews
