Acquired vs2012

I went to see 2012 the day after I finished it. The Americans didn't say anything about making blockbuster movies. But compared to the two, they seem to prefer this disaster film. 2012 used dazzling stunts to consume the end of the world predicted by Maya, and the day after tomorrow was to reflect on humanity with exaggerated ice and snow disasters. Starting from about 40 minutes of the film, the main line of 2012 is to escape. The whole route is probably predictable. Basically, it is to pass five levels and cut six generals, experience a fatal blow and finally hit Huanglong. The 2012 setting is that the protagonist is sloppy and niche, and by chance, he comes into contact with the top secrets (dry lake, crazy Charlie), which leads to the final insight into everything and rescues a big family from a successful counterattack. Pity me, Gordon helped everyone fly the plane and ended up like this.
The day after tomorrow there are two ends-father and son: one retreats, the other sticks to it, and a line drawn in the middle mainly expresses the deep affection between father and son. Here, father and son have similar inscriptions, and the two have full personalities and full of personal charm. Similar story modes also show personal heroism, but acquired a deeper portrayal of human nature. The setting of the scene is quite clever. The library—a place where human civilization is preserved—and people’s survival depends on burning down the carrier of civilization, that is, books. This gives rise to the proposition of people’s choice of civilization and survival. tension. As a result, although the librarian clinging to the Bible has few words, it suddenly broadens the depth of the film. The details were not overlooked, and the pack of wolves did not leave in vain. The critical moments set off Sam's responsibility and courage. A good movie does not allow the protagonist to overwhelm the supporting roles, but allows each character to have its unique soul. In the day after tomorrow, there is not only the bravery of father and son, but also the demeanor of Laura, Jason and Frank's stab at friends, and the professionalism and love of Dr. Lucy Hall. Supporting roles can also be wonderful.
Depth needs detailed support. The feeling that 2012 has not acquired depth to me is largely because the details, especially the touching details, are not enough. The president is one in the church, but such details are too few. The big scene and high technology supported 2012. This has nothing to do with the pros and cons of the film, it involves the positioning of the film. 2012 is to be positioned as a technology-heavy film, there is nothing wrong with it.
ps: 1. It seems that from a theoretical point of view, it is impossible to experience another ice age?
2. Seeing the host's sensationalism, Mexico did not promise to accept a large number of American refugees until the United States promised to forgive all debts, and there was a sense of joy inexplicably.

View more about The Day After Tomorrow reviews