Beibei's Movie World: http://blog.sina.com.cn/bblovesmovies
"Breakfast at Tiffany's" is so famous, I dare say that too many people don't know the plot of the story, maybe not at all After watching this film, I will always remember Audrey Hepburn's little black dress and Tiffany's brand. Whether or not this is a good example of the successful placement of soft ads in earlier films, Breakfast at Tiffany's has become a genre film that is not objectionable.
In fact, if it weren't for this digital TV rebroadcast, I would have completely forgotten the storyline of "Breakfast at Tiffany's". Looking at it this time, it still makes me think that "Breakfast at Tiffany's" is not out of date even in a contemporary setting. For this reason, I have to sigh again. In the 1960s, people could make movies of the type that foreigners are still trying to make. The gap is really not a little bit.
Of course, the topic of money and love has always been the focus, and too many articles and videos are devoted to it. I also once wrote a film review called "Love Classics Are Actually Very 'Heavy Tastes'" and had the honor to publish it in "Watching Movies" magazine. This film is no exception. Although it turns into a love ending in the end, it still cannot change the special identities of the hero and heroine: one is a courtesan who worships money, and the other is a man who eats soft rice, just like in "Golden Jade Alliance" In the same way, one is a woman who worships gold, and the other is Princess Huahua; just like "Beijing meets Seattle", one is a junior, and the other is a man who still eats soft rice. But of course there's nothing wrong with that, who doesn't love money? Upper decision decided by the economic background. Audrey Hepburn was bent on marrying a rich man, but she met and fell in love with a man who ate soft food. It seemed like a trick of fate, but in fact it was because things gathered together and people were divided into groups. This is called the so-called "right to the door". Of course, Audrey Hepburn was not reconciled, so even if she found her temptation, she was still working hard for her rich woman goal. It's just that people often have such a situation, the more they want to get something, the less they can get it. So Audrey Hepburn ended up getting "lost" and her reputation was disgraced. Fortunately, there was a man beside him, a man who fell in love with Audrey Hepburn and stopped eating soft rice. In the end, they hugged each other in the rain and wept, and it ended happily.
Seeing this, I should have been satisfied when I was young. But now, I have to have actual concerns (though I think I'm overdoing it). It's hard for me to imagine a money-loving girl like Tiffany's who can't save $50 in her bank card and is used to buying big names and is willing to give in and live a small life for love? Habits are hard to change. So I'm not sure if this ending is truly happy? I have always felt that God is still fair, and you have to sacrifice something when you get something. So in this sense, if Audrey Hepburn understands this truth, she can gradually change her values and outlook on life. It's just that reality is not always end at the best of times, as movies often show us.
Therefore, I think the inspiration this film gives us is to learn to be content, not to criticize not to worship money. Money is a good thing, it's not wrong for people to love it, it's just a matter of grasping. Audrey Hepburn just couldn't be content, so she ended up replacing money with love. In fact, if she is content, the doctor she loves will still give her the happiness she wants, and she won't force her to marry a rich man she doesn't love because her brother retired from the army to support him. For men, money is also the security and motivation that drives them to get love. Didn't Paul start making money all over again just because he fell in love with Audrey Hepburn?
In the face of money and love, maintain a normal heart. We must actively strive for it, rather than relying too much on it.
View more about Breakfast at Tiffany's reviews
