For example: 1. When he was in a drunk state, he violated the rules, pulled up the joystick and exceeded the speed. Will this process cause the aircraft to malfunction? You can say that he is an art master who is brave, he is proficient in driving skills and defies the rules, but how can you not understand that he is a crazy mistake in a drunk state?
2. The number of bottles he threw away after drinking after getting on the plane is not the same as the number of bottles found during the investigation. In other words, there is a wine bottle that is not within the scope of the investigation. Where did the wine bottle go? Did it fly away during the crash? . . ? Or was it the malfunction of the aircraft caused by this wine bottle? ! This is a detail worth repeating, and there is a lot of room for imagination. Or it can be said that the perpetrator of this incident may be the savior, or is it possible?
I really like this film. Although the emotional drama in the middle feels a little redundant and lengthy, it is generally good, especially the details are unique and I feel that the score is low.
View more about Flight reviews
