It seems that you can't criticize the director too much, because it is said that the second part of the original work is also so inclined to show violence and discard the others. I deliberately searched for comics on the Internet, and sure enough, the author played with violent content in the second part, and there was even a "Times Square Rush", which is really a bit of a follow-up. As the second change work, it is naturally also very tired. The plot is thin and nothing new. If the first part is compared to the first part of Nolan's "Batman Prequel": it is also the hero's self-recognition and rise, from ignorance to maturity, complete a transformation, then the second part can't bear to look directly at it, if Compared with the third final chapter of the former, it also mentioned the sublimation of the spirit and the inspiration to the public. This second part is still lackluster. The story originates from the comics, but because the image of King Hai Bian is not as deeply rooted in the hearts of Batman after all, this determines that the film cannot be too separated from the comics, resulting in a situation of success and failure: in addition to continuing to excavate long-term It seems that it is difficult to find new bright spots outside the relationship between the big male and female protagonists and the confrontation between the alliance of good and evil. The director seems to be like Wendy, unable to find the balance between school and super-killing girls, the life of a girl and the path of a heroine. In the film, even if she deals with the cheerleader, she just uses high-tech tools to humiliate her. This makes it difficult to convince people.
From the plot, many places are too random. Bad boy Chris's mother was electrocuted to death by a machine like this, and Chris was instantly blackened and upgraded after his bodyguard was killed. His name from sm to motherf**ker is too vulgar and brainless. In the face of stinky Russia, the super-killing girl is not an opponent at all. In the end, there is a "strange trick" of adrenaline. Correspondingly, there is a large increase in violent and bloody scenes, which does not help the plot, but highlights these The flaws in the story. In the end, it felt like two teams of brain-dead heroes with scumbag fighting ability. Although they are limited by the story that is not very powerful, the director himself is also to blame. The messy rhythm, the violence that is vented at will, and the lack of key plots, completely lacks the quality that the director should have.
In fact, the theme of this film is very good, and finally said it through King Kipian: We don't need superheroes in life, because what we need is the heroic plot in everyone's heart, which can make each of us become Traits of a true hero. It's a pity that after such a plot, such an excellent theme becomes a didactic. Think about what Gordon said at the end of "The Dark Knight": "He is not a hero, he is a silent guardian, an always vigilant guardian, a dark knight!" Such a long description, completely without preaching, but let People are more shocked. Of course, it's not fair to compare the two, after all, Batman carries a lot more than Kick-off. So, the director of the third part should just grab a little: just be cool!
View more about Kick-Ass 2 reviews
