Looking through the long history of film, it has developed to the present point. For some groups, the concept of "movie" has gone beyond the scope of ordinary people's understanding. At least for countries that have not yet implemented film classification (examples do not need to be enumerated here), movies are still functionally circulated in entertainment, education, consumption, etc., in terms of form, they can be classified as bad. Films and good films, but have we ever thought of completely changing the packaging of the film, breaking free from the shackles of all traditional values, and making a change into a purely cathartic, random creation. Not only do we have to play the cards according to common sense, but also the whole The game is mixed, there are no winners and no losers, chaos is beauty, disorder is order. The film "The End of the World" is just such a movie from beginning to end, which can be said to be a group of people carnival in unintelligible nonsense. A masterpiece of humanities and moral education.
In most cases, once you see the name Logan Seth, you can have a foreboding that this movie must have its strangeness. Not feeling it can only mean that you haven't found it. Sai Pang can not only cool down all the warm elements, but also transform obvious cold jokes into warm words. Comedy is certainly the label of his work, but except for the zombie series, he didn't dabble, and the rest of the dots are stuck to the side. I didn't see him ravaging even a superhero (see "The Green Hornet" for details), and it is probably the only movie where a car should be the protagonist. The recent transformation work "Tangled Journey", is also stupefied to interpret love into family affection, and tinker family affection into love. While lamenting awkwardness, he can't help but shed a few tears. I have to say, this The guy is really charming. This time, he wrote, directed, and acted the heavy release of "The End of the World", while blinding the audience's eyes, trampling on the audience's aesthetics, and destroying the audience's intelligence quotient, they are all hooked. The first-rate, second-rate, third-rate, and influential film and television stars from all walks of life use their real names to ridicule their works. When they praise it, they are three points. When they complain, they are useless. The plot of their story is coherent and incoherent. No matter what is reasonable or unreasonable for the time being, this kind of self-examination posture alone is quite worthy of surprise. Sai Pang talked about the situation of "Pineapple Express" with James Franco, and the dialogue was designed to be real. It is hard to believe that this scene depicts not the two first-line Hollywood superstars discussing work in their usual leisure life.
Watching "The End of the World" on the most surface, to put it bluntly, this is a "bad boy gang movie" like a fake. The term "bad boy gang" is used for commendation in most cases, just as we describe Zhou Xingchi's movie as "nonsensical". It’s just that the Western "Rotten Boy Gang" is much more naked than the Eastern "Wu Li Tou", and its performance is more powerful. Audiences with very correct three views will basically be unable to help themselves. I want to go first. Regarding the structure of the whole story of "The End of the World", I would like to take Steven Spielberg's "War of the World" as an example. "World War" created a precedent to reflect the extreme living environment of the end times from the perspective of the common people, no longer focusing on the government, the army, and important figures. And "The End of the World", isn't this the first bird to show the state of survival in the end times from the perspective of an all-star? Of course, the "doomsday" thing is just a gimmick in most movies. A disaster, an aerial ruined scene, can easily explain to the audience that this story takes place in the context of the apocalyptic era. Have to remember. However, the film directly titled "The End of the World" looks as if its posture has already been revealed, but in fact it presents a scene of being criticized and self-criticized by film and television stars. I have never taken seriously the scenes in the film where the sky is falling apart, the fire of hell is burning, and the lava monsters are raging around. What does this have to do with the end of the world, and what does it have to do with the Bible. It's better to sit around a group of well-known celebrities, chatting about gossip, talking about life, and stating your ideals. Stars who are tall, rich, handsome, and white, rich and beautiful are no different from ordinary people in real life. They still have three anxieties, like flying planes, keen on evil tastes, and their taste is just a chocolate bar and so on. What the film wants to express is that everyone is equal before hell; and in heaven, everyone is their own god.
The celebrities' performances of "shamelessness" and "abandoning morals" really made people feel the slightest touch. In particular, I want to praise Channing Tatum. I am so wronged. Danny McBride wonders if his fans will drown in saliva. Relatively speaking, Emma Watson was a failure. The first second was amazing, the next second was mediocre, which drew the audience's appetite enough, but only gave away the stuff that was not enough to clog the teeth. Compared with the movie 43 released a while ago, you have Naomi Watts, and I have Michael Serra. Each has its own merits, and it's hard to compare. Of course, when watching "The End of the World", you can indulge yourself and think about nothing, but you absolutely can't help but think about this question-"Who will do it if this matter is set aside in China?"
View more about This Is the End reviews
