1. The NSA boss wanted to kill someone, but he was at the scene and made such a low-level mistake. It can be seen that as a national intelligence agency, there has been no progress in the 50-year struggle with the KGB. In the end, he personally went into the tiger's den and was hacked - I really doubt how he survived the Cold War
2. I still don't understand why the villain is so desperate to chase Smith, to kill him? There are so many chances. for surveillance? Nima, if you are under surveillance, you shouldn't chase and kill with great fanfare, so that the whole world knows that the National Security Bureau kills! ——Then it must be to retrieve the video, well, the problem goes back to the first two, in order to capture him to extract a confession and find out the video, there are many opportunities; to find out clues for surveillance, then it should not be opened all over the world. gun. In short, the audience has forgotten their thinking in the director's dazzling skills of blowing up cars and buildings.
3. The monitoring image has a large angle of 75°, so I can't complain.
4. The director is obviously a liberal, and his personal privacy cannot be violated. As a college student in a country with the highest density of school cameras in the world, I express that there is no pressure. Europe and the United States are really hypocritical, hum~~~ There is no doubt that this kind of surveillance has indeed reduced crime. The probability, of course, also violates personal privacy, which requires the monitoring personnel to have good professional quality, and no one wants to be the subject of "Fuzhou University Campus Study Room Sex Video" for the monitoring content not to spread, not spread, and not extort. The protagonist, the management supervisor, has become the premise of all supervision. It was also involved in the film, but it is slightly ironic. The fact is that the United States has handled the relationship between supervisors and supervisors better, and the NSA, FBI, and CIA check and balance each other.
5. Should we monitor personal privacy? This is what the film discusses, but in fact any country has supervised the privacy of the people. During the Cold War, the Winona Project supervised a group of government officials. During the three years when McCarthyism prevailed, it also scrutinized a group of celebrities. It has been criticized by the Tea Party and liberals so far, but the fact is that the Republican Party was right. In the 1950s, there were a lot of pro-Communist left-leaning people in the US government, and even the White House was full of KGB, who helped cut off Chiang's aid and stole nuclear bomb information. Democracy is a small and fresh way of playing, the US has been subverted by the Soviet Union early on, and it is their turn to talk about freedom and ideals at afternoon tea, go to fucking Siberia to dig coal!
How did communist totalitarian states such as the Soviet Union supervise it? "Dangdang, we belong to the community committee, please show your ID card, household registration book, and marriage certificate to prove that you have nothing to do with Bukharin and Trotsky." If not, Gulag welcomes you! In this comparison, the United States is simply a model of humanitarianism!
6. Is it reminiscent of the recent Snowden? I heard that as a mechanic at the periphery of the national security, there is really nothing to disclose to Putin, and the food expenses are a bit tight. Recently, I plan to publish a book to expose the falsehood of the Apollo moon landing. It is estimated that it has something to do with the Rothschild Freemasonry and the little green men in Area 51. , Transformers is on the other side of the moon.
7. Personal privacy must be respected, national interests above privacy must be defended, and the purpose of defending national interests is to better defend everyone's human rights, which must be clear. America is America because of the benign political checks and balances it has formed within it—conservative Republicans and open Democrats—that keep the right from degenerating into a dictatorial police state, and keeping the freshmen out of their jobs.
View more about Enemy of the State reviews
