-Are you kidding me?
Closer to home, the first Hollywood-style anime that I have written a review article with a five-star rating. For this sequel, I can say that I was looking forward to it. However, after watching this movie, although the horizontal comparison with some Hollywood animations in recent years is still not satisfactory, compared with the first movie of this movie, the depth of the concept and the details are not satisfactory to me at least. If the idea can be regarded as a topic where the benevolent sees the benevolent and the wise sees the wisdom, I will talk about the details. Of course, the 3D picture is completely exploded in the past, but a very serious problem in the whole movie is that there are almost few Hollywood styles of the past. "Drama" can cause hilarious laughter in the audience (about what Hollywood-style "drag" is, personally, the style is characterized by "doing a small thing with a daily or serious attitude, but it is messed up or reversed and the contrast is cute but It doesn’t give people the feeling of deliberately making this joke, and it is often used as an auxiliary part of the picture or a scene that is quickly skipped. I don’t want to say it so complicated, but I really don’t know how to condense the language"), at least it must be a small part of the film. The monster said, "We have cake", but when the big monster passed by, he ate it in one bite. The negative textbook is the section where the snail goes to school in the film. Not to mention how old this stalk is. I estimate that the picture stayed on this non-protagonist and non-main line for at least 15 seconds, and 10 seconds were when the snail ran. That hardly moving picture-the director is not EVA watching too much, right? Just put it for two seconds. The audience can fully understand the meaning of this stalk. It is obvious that the rhythm of the main line in the middle and late stages is not slow. Is it necessary to do this kind of thing that gives people the feeling of insufficient funding? I think it would be better to take two seconds out of it and echo the screen at the end. Some people may think that I have grasped this point too much and made a fuss. In fact, there are many places in the whole film that have this problem. For example, when OK will attend the party, the multi-eyed monster invited Sullivan to dance. Wasky led OK. I would avoid the librarian in the contest, etc. The director always gave me a desire to extend the duration of the clip in order to let the audience know "There is a joke here". This kind of cleverness is actually very easy to set fire to myself. of.
Just a few words about Pixar. I don't know much about Hollywood comics, and I don't know much about Pixar. I just say a few words as a layman bystander. For me, the Toy Story series is the beginning of my appreciation of Pixar, Monster Company is the reason why I love Pixar, Walli and Flying House are the pinnacles of my praise for Pixar, and the legend of Brave is the beginning of Pixar. Late suspicion-I think a lot of people who have some contact with Pixar but don't have deep contact should feel the same. By the way, last year, a group of people who scolded the audience for the brave legends were scolded by the audience. They were destroyed by the invincible before their voices were destroyed. Wang’s face was really vivid. I don’t know if Monster University will also have a scavenging party. I think always There is. Of course, since I am boasting the Invincible Destruction King, I still have to express my vision in the end. I hope that the combination of Disney and Pixar can bring more and more works like this kind of combined two, rather than the so-called blending of the essence of the two. The doctrine of the mean-otherwise I might as well watch the ecstasy once a year.
View more about Monsters University reviews
