It's not the first time I've complained about a war scene in a western epic. Although it looks huge, it's stupid. The number of people is as small as a family, and the tactics are as simple as guessing. Whoever is gasping for more will start screaming at a sky-high price. In the island country, fighting a battle with thousands of people is considered a war. Think of the number of soldiers who broke a city pit and killed hundreds of thousands during the Warring States Period, let alone fighting in advance. If that kind of scene was put on the screen How magnificent it is, it is a pity that Chinese directors are not up to the standard, and Chinese film companies are all poor. When can I see the scene of Chinese epic films scaring foreigners to piss.
Just like a classic scene in a Hong Kong movie, Lionheart said quietly that if he won the city, he could go back to London, and then he was shot to death by a pawn guarding the city. In history, Richard was shot by a sneak attack and then died of corruption. The second reality of this mindless rush to death in the film made me complain about his incompetence.
Audiences who have watched a lot of Western epic films will definitely be hypnotized by the routine plot adopted in this film. Heroes fall out of the grass or they are successful. When they meet a noble person, they suddenly realize that they are very powerful, and then inexplicably they have a large group of fans. By the way, holding the beauty back makes you have to wonder whether his personality is too charismatic, or whether he is born a management master, how he is loved by everyone, and what he does.
Under such a boring setting, no matter how deafening words the protagonist shouted, I am afraid that the audience will not buy it. Russell Crowe looks like he has been wronged all the year round. When facing the king's request for liberty, his aura is really After being bombarded a few streets by Mel Gibson, how can it look like an American director is borrowing British heroes to export American values, and suddenly the person standing in front of the king is no longer a green forest hero, but a superhero.
In the traditional impression, Robin Hood should give people the sense of sight of an elf shooter. The Robin Hood created by Russell Crowe only gives people a sense of stupidity of a butcher, not like a thief who robs the rich to help the poor, but a cowardly hunter.
In the end, I think that the island country of the most beautiful indeed has the strengths of the most. In addition to the charter, it still falls into the cliché of "living happily together from now on", which seems to have the meaning of a sequel, but there is no movement so far.
Lionheart, King John was in the dark period. China is the Southern Song Dynasty, which is full of singing and dancing. All the king's palaces in this type of movie are simply built out of stones. It's so atmospheric, why doesn't it feel as gorgeous as a brothel in Yangzhou?
At about the same time as Robin Hood led the crowd to gather in the mountains and forests, a hundred danba generals in the east, separated by more than half the world, were also forced to ascend to Liangshan.
Compared to "Gladiator" and "Kingdom of the Hood," both directed by Ridley Scott, this film always feels weak and focuses entirely on how archer Robin Longstride transformed into Robin of the Hood. The chivalrous story after Robin Hood's downfall is inked, and the plot is slightly protracted.
Generally speaking, as an epic film, it has the style of restoring history, and it is still qualified.
I heard that Robin Hood shot an arrow when he was dying, and that he was rebellious and shot a lifetime. What happened to the extrajudicial madmen who gathered all over England? It was the lords who forced the king to sign the Magna Carta who changed history.
Heroes are twilight, but they are eternal, so there is no need to sigh this time.
View more about Robin Hood reviews
