When director Assayas was 13 years old in 1968, he should be regarded as a character like the younger brothers of revolutionaries. He is more likely to watch the seniors and seniors waving posters, flyers, parades, and graffiti without really participating in it. In that year, Paris was rich in products, but the spirits were empty. College students stood at the forefront of the agitation, but they were still trapped by old traditions and old educational concepts. For example, imagine a large group of young people getting together and being forbidden to fall in love by the school. What else? It can arouse people's indignation more than this (of course this is not the main reason), so the students stand together against the school and the situation intensifies. Nanterre College) so invited the state machine to enter the campus, which completely angered the students. After the students first threw the Molotov cocktail, the intellectuals and industrial workers in Paris joined the team one after another, and the slogans and demands became more obvious later. Colored with these strata what the film tries to present is that in the end the movement is said to have failed (successfully suppressed, or rather disbanded) and the young people who had joined the movement had to start dealing with their unspent enthusiasm Get out of school and on the streets and try to enter society in your own idealistic way It's a way that young people all over the world are familiar with Even if it's not what we think it's not many different movements Fruits are brewed into wine for them to travel and party In Tasting 1968 we were at the WG If we call May in France a storm then the decade here is a nuclear storm a WG read from the MAO that appears in the movie to let us see that these young people are actually inspired and even guided by that ideology The ultimate goal of the movement is much the same, to correct or clear the existing order. The slogans shouted under such a goal are all heartening. WG has exported an empty blood to the French youth. This is all they are connected. No more The positive effects of the May storm cleaning up and down French society are far-reaching and this makes it more connected (to some extent) with our movement. The two movements are more similar in spirit. To say that the evolution of the May storm actually stemmed from the French view of the revolution I would not agree I would prefer to think it was a college student - an ideology beloved by young people as depicted in a poster in this film: We went to the revolution with guitars and guns with flowers
This romantic attitude makes young people see the revolution as a carnival rather than a violent movement. Like-minded people cannot be happy for the same reason. The desire to be poured out of self and emotion is brewing in everyone's heart. The last touch is not young. Really single-mindedly expecting something to be destroyed (like ZF change) They enjoy the joy of the revolutionary process itself rather than the result they will appeal to writing slogans that are more like lyrics We are now watching that movement from outside the wall back then If you don't read the title, it's hard to tell how different the enthusiasm in their eyes is from the young people in the midi stage. Rock and revolution are both outlets for our youth, they are both free and rebellious. This is the mood we want in peaceful times. They are more aware of the undercurrents under the surface of peace than middle fingers. In harmonious times, we are also better than middle fingers (in fact, we prefer index finger + little finger now) Although it is better than to different people, the inner motivation is the same, of course I It’s not that young people devote themselves to the revolution with the original intention of having fun. It’s just that the context of the revolution fits the inner aspirations of the young people at that time. This kind of fit is hard to be noticed by the young people themselves, not to mention the revolution that is based on the premise of this motivation. It's not that the right thing can't be done. The May storm and the claims made in that movement still seem progressive and healthy to us today, especially the latter generation of young people who shed blood for justice and are still charged. Although the May storm occurred earlier, in that movement, the revolutionaries and repressors adhered to the bloodless bottom line. When the behavior of the students began to get out of control, the turn of public opinion also began to control the bottom line. All in all, this is a movement launched by two groups of the same young people because of the same ideology (they are both a "rebellion with food and clothing"), but only because of their different isms and ultimately reaped completely different fates The whole world Still running after that May Mai 68 in France The generation has become the backbone of the whole society (post-backbone) The whole of France has enjoyed the legacy of the storm Looking back at our generation of young people who have entered their prime but are still silent The new generation Young people have basically no idea what happened at the time When it came out months later its label was not "fantasy" but "history"
View more about Something in the Air reviews
