In view of the fact that the film has not been released for a few days, let's briefly describe the places worth watching.
1. The title of DreamWorks Animation has always been an easter egg in the film.
2. The number of scenes and character models involved in this film is comparable to that of "Avatar".
3. There are a lot of laughs in the film, which basically meets the basic needs of the public who want a 3-minute laugh and a 5-minute laugh.
4. As a married couple with children, this film can be watched with peace of mind, because as a person who has watched the film with a bunch of children, the children will also be deeply attracted by this film.
5. The plot is also ups and downs, the main line is clear, and the rhythm is getting more and more compact.
6. There are easter eggs at the end of the film. If you don't see the easter eggs, it means that you haven't seen the end of the film. The content of the easter eggs will not be spoiled.
------------------------------------- Here is the dividing line --------- ---------------------- Those who
haven't seen the movie, please detour~~~~~~~~~
First, briefly describe the cause, process and result of the story.
The protagonist explained the family background and worldview in the form of a mural (just like "How to Train Your Dragon"), and
then Guy told the protagonist that the end of the world was coming.
Gai was kidnapped by the protagonist's family and finally merged into a family to escape the disaster together.
The caveman family learned to create and think and survived the apocalypse successfully.
It's such a simple story, but it can make the whole process high-energy, even the devil in the theater-----the child can conquer it, it's just some personal imagination.
The first is that multiple arcs are important for character building, the change in the relationship between father and daughter, and the other is the change in father's understanding of accepting new things.
In terms of villains, there are countless large and small monsters, and it seems that any one of them has the courage to kill you 3000, but as the big BOSS in the main line, it is naturally the destructive force of nature. Through a sentence from the actor Gai, although the source of this sentence is unknown, it has already told us that this movie has a time setting, just like in "Inception", the Japanese Saito was shot in the body, Let the rhythm of this film be reasonably quickened.
The film is constructed with a considerable number of scenes and models, each with its own set of baggage. That is to say, the animals that appear in each animation will make a lot of jokes because of their own characteristics, which is also shown in the dragon in "How to Train Your Dragon". The most outstanding monsters are the belt monkey next to Guy and the dog-like baby at home. My personal take on these creatures is that they are not considered the main symbols of the work, but rather as a means of enriching the worldview, as well as a means of adding humor. But it is precisely because of its large number and scale that what could have been a single scene has been restored to the appearance of a certain prehistoric location.
And then there's the utopian ending that makes this a great movie for all ages. The beginning of the film has already been rendered, how difficult it is to survive here, but the family is full of blood and demons. At the end of the film, not only did they get a quick son-in-law (visually a genius), but also conquered many Pokemon. It is not difficult to imagine that if at the end, the father threw the family out of the other side of the barrier and died by himself, this ending would be like the story of "Tibetan Antelope on the Other Side of the Rainbow", heroic and unforgettable. On the one hand, the father used his little wit to return to his family to meet the main theme of innovation and breaking through difficulties. On the other hand, the ending of Utopia also just met the audience's ardent need for positive energy. I remember what the drama teacher said: "The director has the responsibility to pass on a positive energy to the audience."
I keep it in my heart, so that when I watch Hollywood-style cartoons now, there is a subtext of "None of them can die" hypnotizing myself, but it is also very distressing to be able to guess it every time.
I remember there was a passage where the puppy learned to roll over and fell into the valley. That passage was a joke. Later, it was a pity to think that such a cute little guy died, and then I thought of what the teacher said, and sure enough, the puppy finally came back to life full of blood and demons. So ~~~ The screenwriter has sacrificed too much in order to cater to the needs of the audience.
On the subject of the film, there are multiple ways to demonstrate the importance of innovation. The premise is that under the impact of a major change in the world (doomsday), innovation brings new vitality, no matter where it is.
First of all, a caveman's cave is a closed environment. Every day cavemen go out of the cave to accept new things. After that, they return to the cave to digest them. The so-called digestion and rules here are applied to the system. Just like my father slaps dangerous things on the wall every time, the closed environment of the cave is equivalent to the rules.
When the big change comes, the physique will be disintegrated, and the caveman has to try to change it. The iconic scene here is that the bird-like monster is caught by the trap and becomes a roast chicken and is eaten by everyone. What I want to say is that the rules are not unchangeable.
Combining the symbols of the characters again: the father is the totalitarian ruler, the daughter is the changer, and the new human being is the part that is out of control. Here, my father also used the canopy to buckle the cover countless times. However, in the face of the impact of the general environment, the two sides gradually reached a consensus and eventually withstood the test. It is self-evident what the film wants to express in the end.
Regarding the success that can be reproduced, it is unrealistic to use the title of the film as a title, but after writing so much, what I actually want to say is the following: the number of animated films that have been applauded and popular over the past few years has been increasing, and for the tastes of most people, In fact, the common characteristics of these films are obvious:
there must be guys in the film who can't speak and are only responsible for being funny and cute.
The more detached the world view is from reality, or the more full of fairy tale color, the stronger the sense of substitution.
The relationship between men and women does not necessarily have to have, but family affection must be reflected. (If you have never been in love, you must have a mother~)
This story generally can't be dead. The
villain is either bad and hopeless, or nature, or bad and can't tell. Anyway, it is necessary for good people to overcome it. It's not like the male protagonist of "Law Abiding Citizen" and the double-faced man in "Batman" who are both good and evil.
There should be enough jokes, a movie with a 3-minute laugh and a 5-minute laugh can’t be put on the stage for children
to watch. In addition to the mindless film "Xiyangyang", there is no successful film in China. In my opinion, the audience positioning of cartoons is wrong, and animations that lie to children are not fart in front of adults. If the emotion is not real, then the final product is just a tool to make money, what about works. I hope that one day I can see domestic cartoons occupying domestic theaters on a large scale, and I can convince such a scum-level audience with the pomp of one hour per hour.
View more about The Croods reviews
