1. Pupil steals - Barristers in the UK are all from wealthy families, because the starting requirements are very high - it seems that only the top students of Oxbridge can, the competition is cruel and after graduation, before building a customer network, the income is not high but the expenses Huge, and these aren't even affordable for the average middle-class, for someone like that, £1800 is nothing, and if he's caught stealing, all his previous efforts will be nullified , can no longer find a job as a lawyer. There was once a barrister who had his license revoked after he forgot to swipe his card on the bus, so it's hard for me to imagine a pupil daring to steal from a lawyer haunt, especially when his personal characteristics are so obvious.
2. Pupil is super incompetent - with little performance or help, and doesn't even understand the most basic common sense in the legal profession - such as defending criminals is part of a lawyer's job. Law and morality have nothing to do with it.
3. The female lead's rebuttal is not convincing at all, which is my biggest disappointment - not even as boston legal. If it wasn't for the old man who just said Da Ha gas, the failure of the heroine would be an inevitable thing, and it would also lead to aggravating the sentence. And after snoring, there are no traces on the door. This does not mean that the police officer wiped the traces off. It is entirely possible that the suspect wiped it off with his gloves - and the strange thing is that neither the procecutor nor the police officer This point is refuted, especially the police officer did not refute it - if the heroine's inference is correct that the police officer erased the traces himself, this is a very serious scandal, and it is very likely that the police officer and his boss will resign or even be prosecuted. The police officer trembled and acquiesced, which clearly contradicted the description in the investigation report that there were no traces on the doorknob - if he did it, he should be very sensitive and come up with excuses. In fact, it was indeed the suspect who wiped it off himself, and later sent a medal to the heroine. As for the obvious evidence loopholes such as slide time, it should be raised at the beginning, and the memory problem of the elderly should also be raised at the beginning. There is also the case of drug lords. Although the screenwriter said that it was a pregnant woman who wanted to go to jail, the heroine was actually a good deed, but the writer could not cover up the mistake that the heroine did not read the dossier at all, which resulted in the client being sentenced to aggravated sentences.
4. The female protagonist's contender is taking drugs at her own social party - I personally think it is no different from trying to sexually harass the female protagonist during a court break - a stupid suicide that is extremely brain-dead to completely out of reality, and the American gangsters know that they should go to the bathroom , he actually sat on the stairs and took medicine in a grand manner? The hostess actually just accused him of something, but did not call the police. That pupil even looked scared when he pushed him down the stairs during the tearing? This is actually an oversized handle that was given to him for nothing. . The man was taking medicine and trying to assault the heroine. Even if he pushed the man down the stairs and fell to his death, he would not have to pay legal responsibility.
View more about Silk reviews
