This film by the director of Fight Club seems to make fighting. The club's fans were shocked and disappointed, but in my opinion, I don't think it's very bad in it, and the story is novel, playing a chase game in a big house, fighting wits, is it a brain-dead thief and It's satirical swearing, so it's definitely not a meaningful movie, pure opinion, it's neutral, you don't think it's too bad, but you can't find it bad.
Think about what a savage plus a brain-dead plus a non-criminal robber can get from the robbers in the movie. The premise should be to resolve their internal conflicts first is the fundamental key, right? It's interesting, but all the coincidences in the film are really too lucky. First, the three robbers killed each other and then robbed each other. This can be said to be the end of the American audience's wish. Among the robbers, the good ones didn't die, and the bad ones were left. Then There is nothing exciting, and the big house space seems to be what the plot needs, with elevators and refuge rooms, so the director put the movie's highlights on the IQ process of the chase. Fortunately, he did it properly. There are several shooting methods. I prefer the transformation of space and the use of slow motion. Both of them create a tense atmosphere and achieve entertainment at the same time. In the end, what left me speechless was that the good robber killed the bad one. , It just feels like a robber farce written by a brain-dead screenwriter. The family finally wins. It can be imagined that the American spirit ranks first in the whole play, and professionalism ranks last.
Although Judie and Forest's two actresses have played a relatively high level of acting, as a typical entertainment commercial film in the United States, they are purely for their own amusement.
2012.Nov.25
3:26 am
View more about Panic Room reviews
