Actually I've been looking forward to being a pervert killer, step back or even someone with the ability to manipulate human minds doing these things. For example, the young policeman later found out that the policeman was really a loyal assistant, but he appeared so neurotic at first, but later became so wise, did he want the audience to think that he was hiding? The old policeman is just playing soy sauce, he should be able to make a big fuss about him, right? The old professor was born for the symbols in the movie. I think it would be more interesting for the protagonist to look up the book by himself. It may be better to give the old professor's role to the sleepwalking boy and the little girl who loves to draw.
In the end, it was a demon who manipulated the child to kill people. He killed so many people just to get the child, so he just kidnapped him. Do you want to highlight the demon's bloodthirsty?
Or this is the film's intention to make an unexpected ending. It is indeed unexpected, but there are too many surprises, but this is the way the film is. Just watch it, and the filming is done, even if the audience thinks of more. A better ending and a better plot don't help either.
In fact, I didn't quite understand this movie review myself. Maybe I haven't written anything for a long time, and my ability to organize language is much worse. I can't express what I think in my heart. I hope someone can understand me. what is it?
View more about Sinister reviews