Passing Movies, Failing Bourne Movies

Beaulah 2022-03-20 09:01:19

Basically, this film can get a passing score, the production is quite good, the scenes are passable, and the quality of the actors is not bad. But if it is the fourth installment in the Bourne Spy series, then it is definitely a failing movie. I have to say that the first three Remakes are really good, one is better than the other, which is very rare. This one vividly interprets what is called a dog tail sequel, although this one doesn't seem to be that bad.

The following plots are revealed, please choose by yourself.

The beginning of the film is really good, the snow-capped mountains in Alaska are really majestic, and I almost didn't recognize Reina's beard, hehe. After a series of unexplained actions, the liaison station they were in was blasted into the sky by missiles. Here comes the first huge loophole.

The drone in the film uses the "Predator" series. According to actual information, the later improved armed "Predator" carries the AGM-114 Hellfire (Hellfire, Hellfire) missile, which is a designed To deal with air-to-surface missiles that are active point targets, the range is about 20KM and the rate of fire is 0.7~0.8M, that is to say, it takes about 73~80 seconds to run the entire distance. And it takes more than 50 seconds for the sound to transmit 20KM, that is to say, it takes only about 20 seconds from when Reina hears the sound of the missile to when he reacts and escapes. Well, everyone knows how many seconds it takes in the movie, and dodging missiles is a bit of a bummer.

Then it was to jet off, escape, and run back to American soil. There is a plot where the tracker is thrown into the wolf's mouth to confuse the infrared sensor guidance. It is very creative, and I can learn from PLA. A series of routines from the beginning to here undoubtedly borrowed from the first three Spy Shadows. Just had a little appetite, and then, there is a second huge loophole.

In the film, Reina ran to a small airport, got a small twin-engine plane and ran back to the United States. Uncle screenwriter, do you know how much range that piston twin-engine aircraft has? How far is Alaska from the continental United States? Could an escaped agent fly a small plane through Canadian airspace undetected? How many other airports can I find in Canada to land and refuel? Or do you think such an aircraft could span thousands of kilometers with the support of USAF aerial tankers?

Well, stop complaining for the time being, don't care about it, the later plot is still very outrageous, and I keep wanting to wear the first three parts, trying every means to be close to Matt Damon, okay, I admit it , even the ID photo Matt Damon is still very handsome. But if you only show your face with a photo of your ID, you have to put yourself under the banner of others, which is a bit shameless.

The design of the female scientist is also extremely contradictory. She has always appeared with a cold face before, and she can't hold it. As a result, when the CIA started killing people, it was frightened like a chicken, and after being rescued, it changed to the image of a heroic and fearless female agent, and finally rescued the protagonist from danger with a series of shadowless legs. Defeat the final boss!

I said, directors and screenwriters, can you make the characters normal? Although it is a vase role, don't treat people so casually, okay? (Don't say that she is a female pig's foot, because he didn't have sex with a male pig's foot, hoho!) It's too irresponsible for you to change your face three times in just a few minutes. I want to say that a woman who has been working with the CIA for several years, a woman who is called a powerful agent as an experiment by numbers, a woman whose personal freedom has been restricted for many years, should have been prepared for all this, even if she kills people. You should be a little more conscious when the silence comes, right? What's your sister's frightened look like? The road is unsteady, and even if he is rescued into the car, he still looks restless, is he weak?

The later plot is a trip down the water, sneaking into the pharmaceutical factory to find medicine, escaping the pursuit, hiding in the market, and escaping the pursuit again after being discovered, and finally at ease overseas, there are no ups and downs, and there is no foreshadowing, the roof chase scene is still Yes, but we should be used to the plots that we often see in Hong Kong films, so even though the action is designed in a parkour style, we still feel a little weak. In the end, chasing the car and killing the agent is all the credit of the female doctor, and has nothing to do with the protagonist.

In fact, there are still a few loopholes in the back, but I don't plan to review it again, so let's leave the loopholes for everyone to find. Anyway, the screenwriter's book can see the roughness of the rush, and many loopholes are natural things!

In general, this sequel draws on the routines of the previous three films, or copied the routines of general spy action movies. There are not many action scenes, and Reina's acting skills are not bad. In fact, it can be regarded as a normal popcorn commercial film. However, compared to the unstoppable and unceasing desire to rewatch the first three films, this Bourne Bourne 4 can be said to have directly smashed the signature of the series, and from the perspective of plot design, it has not been buried for the sequel. Foreshadowing, it is estimated that the espionage series may come to an end. Universal's practice of getting one more vote through the series' reputation is even more contemptible!

View more about The Bourne Legacy reviews

Extended Reading

The Bourne Legacy quotes

  • Retired Adm. Mark Turso, USN: You were given a Ferrari and your people treated it like a lawnmower.

  • [last lines]

    Dr. Marta Shearing: Are we lost?

    Aaron Cross: No, I was just looking at our options.

    Dr. Marta Shearing: Oh, I was kinda hoping we were lost.