It’s hard to see a pure love film that is innovative and not about terminal illnesses. If you must first throw a negative comparison object, I suggest to compare it with “The First Time”. When the mainland movie is still satisfied When remaking or plagiarizing the script of Korean films, Koreans have found something new. But in fact, the first love story told in "Introduction to Architecture" is very old, walking on the rails, listening to CDs, hurting each other due to misunderstandings... In these points, it is as vulgar and boring as the plot of a gangster falling in love with a prostitute. The movie has similarities with Nine Swords "The Girl We Chased Together in Those Years", both of which use relatively novel packaging methods, such as the title of the film, the former sounds like a big tome of architecture. "Introduction to Architecture" had a good performance in the Korean film box office in the first half of the year. The relationship and first love movies are always selling well, and there is a wave from time to time. I guess, the reason may be this: sad first love stories can set off love better. nice. It is not to say that there is no perfect case that can be achieved overnight, but it is too rare and difficult to find. After all, first love people are often naive, immature, and immature. They can't end up together at the best of times. The injury of first love is actually a threshold for most people to reach maturity and the adult world. Many viewers must feel that the male protagonist of "Introduction to Architecture" is a glass-hearted, self-inflicted and unlivable. His temperament was so irritating that he didn't look back after saying ruthless words, which made people want to go up and kick a few times, or else he would be like the taxi driver inside, pulling him a slap in the face. However, it is precisely in such a character who exposes personality flaws that many people will see the shadow of the past. It is often said that fate is unfair. In the final analysis, many things are not linked together, and you will harm yourself. Personally, at least, when he got angry with his mother and kicked the iron gate for no reason, he seemed to be kicked as well. So it's no wonder that when you see the details behind you, you can't help but sigh, this is fate, and one day you will understand - you kicked out viciously, the door is broken, rusted, and it can never be restored to its original state. In addition to the door of the house, there are also passages where the male protagonist lies outside the door and leaves sadly. In fact, if it is a little more straightforward, the problem will be solved. However, without these character factors, and without misunderstandings and misunderstandings, the story of "Introduction to Architecture" would not be able to take shape. Doors that I can't go back to, doors I dare not knock on, after so many back and forth, the tragic script of the first love has been written, and in the end, it can only be left as a tribute to the architectural model in the garbage heap. Summarizing the story of "Introduction to Architecture" is also very simple, he built a home for her, and then left his home to find a home on the other side of the ocean. Video craze really shows the house From the internal deconstruction and overall appearance, it can be seen that it carries the love of the protagonist. I like the beginning of this relationship very much. It is not a special introduction class, starting from knowing my city, to the neighborhood where I am, traveling and traveling. The implication is that the teacher wants you to know yourself (actually, the function may be just to elicit the encounter between the two). Due to the introduction of the home, "Introduction to Architecture" has a thicker and more human touch. When it comes to the family members of both parties, there is some helplessness every time, but life goes on. I even feel that it is this invisible power that secretly guides the two protagonists to go on and meet again. GEUSS, once regarded as a disgrace, is still worn by the mother. The piano that I once wanted to give up is still playing in the end. As far as the rice sausage soup, the height marking... In the face of the details scattered randomly, I can only say that Korean films are quite moving. Like the film's protagonist, "Introduction to Architecture" also has obvious flaws, such as the old-fashioned bridges mentioned earlier. In addition, in the process of retrospect, the movie is not compact enough (the viewing experience will be obviously inferior to "Sunshine Sisters"). It's too draggy when it needs to be neat and tidy. Perhaps, this is also the biggest dead end that prevents it from becoming a classic, and can only be read as a first love prose. Due to my movie-watching habits, I couldn't help but think of the movie as tacky, including breaking the marriage contract, revisiting the mandarin duck dream, and finally there should be a happy reunion. No, the male lead really flew to the United States in the end. I once thought that the protagonists of Korean films would not abandon their homeland, at least like "National Representative", no matter what, they must have a sense of national honor. In these unexpected places, Korean films have been changing, and it is worth learning Chinese films again and again.
View more about Architecture 101 reviews
