At first glance, I thought that I had no chance for political thrillers in my life, but later I found out that the film is still very good, and George Clooney's taste level is really not low, which is related to his passion for politics. .
In the story, Stephen fully supported Morris in order to realize his noble and lofty ideals (at that time he saw the intoxicated eyes of Morris' speech), but he was still plotted by the old fritters, and he was bitten by Morris, but he also had an ace in his hand. How ironic it is to recapture dreams by spurned dark means. . . At the end of the film, his reporter asked questions and made a speech. I don't know what choice he would make. Is it to reveal that everything is still just in the world or to keep his status? Whether all of this is down to the system or human nature, Clooney doesn't give an answer, and in the end it's just a thriller to show a wonderful story about a corner of American politics, and it's good to be able to do so.
In terms of acting, Ryan Golins is generally successful, and Clooney has few roles, but that fan is very mature, and the supporting roles of Philip Seymour Hoffman and Paul Giamatti are very exciting.
The overall production is successful, and it is one of the most dynamic and powerful films I have seen recently.
View more about The Ides of March reviews
