The film turns money into time, and it explains in a more profound way how the upper class enslaves the lower class through social tools and obtains once and for all, almost hereditary glory and wealth.
Superficially and formally, the film shows how the only way the lower class can resist this structural injustice of society.
To equal wealth, we can use the word "revolution" to refer to history.
However, when people become rich, the poor are no longer oppressed, the rich no longer dominate others, but factories have stopped working, the police are also unemployed, and social functions have been lost. On the surface, everyone in the entire group is rich, but in fact it is a step backwards to primitives.
No one works, no order.
Everyone is guilty and not guilty. Everyone has the right but neither has the right. Everyone has money, but no money.
After the rich and the poor are divided, everything is not governed by the social order, but regressed to being held by human nature and controlled by ability. Darwin's era will come, and it will be more cruel.
Then it can be imagined that thousands of years of tribal wars have promoted the emergence and evolution of social structures, and gradually everything is restored to its original appearance. This is the repetition of our human history.
Quoting the original words in the movie,
Is that so? You might upset the balance for a generation. Two. But don't fool yourself. In the end, nothing will change. Because everyone wants to live forever. They all think they have a chance at immortality even though all the evidence is against it. They all think they will be the exception. But the truth is, for a few to be immortal, many must die
.
View more about In Time reviews
