What wins is not morality but strength

Jarrell 2022-03-20 09:01:36

You can not know everything so
everything wrong that you can not judge the
world does not have the moral high ground

, everyone's situation is different and
every family has been in the cupboard
Everyone has their own stake
right or wrong in the eyes of everyone Because

of this, I always use morality as a guideline
when thinking about problems. Most of the time, the

righteous people who have problems will win?
Evil people must be unlucky?

Please don't say that

justice wins because it protects the majority
because it is above the majority network of interests
so it is powerful and
evil is unlucky because it ultimately hurts the masses
falls on a huge network of interests
so it is defeated and

won to the end It's Power, Not Morality

View more about The Insider reviews

Extended Reading
  • Nina 2022-01-26 08:15:20

    Journalism is an industry that tells secrets. It requires reporters to let people say what they should have said (observe and reflect, cut through to gain trust, find the truth, test the facts, and let the interviewee take risks) and let people hear what they should have said. Hear the words (under the pressure of being reconciled); since telling the truth often brings great damage, the person who wants to conceal the facts will attack the source in various ways, and finally you may face the situation: what is the fact, you The fact that will fight you. Wrestling is everywhere, and it is very difficult to fight against capital and state machinery. It is not that you alone are ready to tell the facts and the facts can work. This is this society. There will always be people who compromise, and the wisdom of the people may not be able to make them stand on the side of the truth, because the direction of public opinion can be manipulated. So are you ready to tell the truth? Are you ready to face the public? Are you ready to face the tremendous changes that your facts have brought you? /Michael Mann made an excellent genre film on this subject in his unique style, which is amazing.

  • Ivory 2022-01-26 08:15:20

    Is it a newsman or a businessman? Is it a struggle or a compromise? Countless people stand up, countless people fall, the truth is always so cruel.

The Insider quotes

  • Lowell Bergman: [Kluster demands that Wigand's interview be censored into an alternate version] I'm not touching my film.

    Eric Kluster: I'm afraid you are.

    Lowell Bergman: No, I'm not.

    Eric Kluster: We're doing this with or without you, Lowell. If you like, I can sign another producer to edit your show.

    Lowell Bergman: Uh, since when has the paragon of investigative journalism allowed LAWYERS to determine the news content on 60 Minutes?

  • Mike Wallace: You heard Mr. Sandefur say before Congress that he believed nicotine was not addictive.

    Jeffrey Wigand: I believe Mr. Sandefur perjured himself because I watched those testimonies very carefully.

    Mike Wallace: All of us did, and it was this whole line of people, whole line of CEOs up there, all swearing.

    Jeffrey Wigand: Part of the reason I'm here is that I felt that their representations clearly misstated - at least within Brown and Williamson's representation - clearly misstated what is common language within the company: "We are in the nicotine delivery business."

    Mike Wallace: And that's what cigarettes are for.

    Jeffrey Wigand: A delivery device for nicotine.

    Mike Wallace: A delivery device for nicotine. Put it in your mouth, light it up, and you're gonna get your fix.

    Jeffrey Wigand: You're gonna get your fix.

    Mike Wallace: You're saying that Brown and Williamson manipulates and adjusts the nicotine fix not by artificially adding nicotine but by enhancing the effect of nicotine through the use of elements such as ammonia?

    Jeffrey Wigand: The process is known as "impact boosting". While not spiking nicotine, they clearly manipulate it. There was extensive use of this technology known as "ammonia chemistry". It allows for the nicotine to be more rapidly absorbed in the lung and therefore affect the brain and central nervous system. The straw that broke the camel's back for me, and really put me in trouble with Sandefur, was a compound called coumarin. When I came on board at B. and W., they had tried the transition from coumarin to a similar flavor that would give the same taste, and had been unsuccessful. I wanted out immediately. I was told that it could affect sales, so I should mind my own business. I constructed a memo to Mr. Sandefur indicating I could not in conscience continue with coumarin, a product we now know and we had documentation was similar to coumadin, a lung-specific carcinogen.

    Mike Wallace: And you sent the documents to Sandefur?

    Jeffrey Wigand: I sent the documents forward to Sandefur. I was told that we would continue to work on a substitute but we weren't going to remove it as it would impact sales, and that was his decision.

    Mike Wallace: In other words, you were charging Sandefur and Brown and Williamson with ignoring health considerations consciously?

    Jeffrey Wigand: Most certainly.

    Mike Wallace: And on March 24th, Thomas Sandefur, CEO of Brown and Williamson, had you fired. And the reason he gave you?

    Jeffrey Wigand: "Poor communication skills."

    Mike Wallace: And you wish you hadn't come forward? You wish you hadn't blown the whistle?

    Jeffrey Wigand: Yeah, at times I wish I hadn't done it. There were times I felt compelled to do it. If you ask me would I do it again, do I think it's worth it? Yeah, I think it's worth it.