I saw this movie a long time ago, and I took a screenshot and sent it to the space (the one where the villain was dismembered). The movie left a deep impression on me, and I specially recommended it to my nephew Kuang Zheng. Here, I would like to share some of my superficial views with you.
We know that the laws used by the evil imperialist country America belong to the European and American legal system and can be negotiated. Their laws are tools used by the bourgeoisie to deal with the proletariat, unlike the laws of our socialist countries. It is the interests of the broadest masses of the people that can be implemented, and it is not as fair, honest, efficient and popular as our judges who sit in courts that claim the judiciary has become independent but eat the government's food and listen to the words of the Political and Legal Committee. The law is inherently problematic, and judges and prosecutors are inherently compromising. Of course, we are basking in the sunshine of judicial justice, and we should not be too demanding of others. After all, this is the inherent weakness of the bourgeoisie! But in this film, this legal issue becomes the beginning of all evil.
Why did Clyde Shelton kill, because justice could not be served, and he was wronged. I don't know why, in a just and harmonious society like ours, when I watched this movie, I had some sort of resonance that seemed to be touching, really, it made me feel like I was living in a disharmonious society of. Hey, you have to read the articles in the Land of Nothing and the Global Times, otherwise you will easily get lost. It is still necessary to strengthen theoretical study!
Pull away.
Anyway, anyway, this movie impressed me in many ways, especially the revenge scene of Clyde Sheldon. I really like Gerard Butler's melancholy and sharp eyes and his thick beard, he said to Darby indifferently: "You can't move, but you have feeling, he will never numb the pain, because Now you will experience pain that you can't imagine." In order to repay the hatred of his wife and daughter being tortured and killed, he planned to prepare for ten years, and prepared equipment for the enemy that you could never imagine: "Salt water, maintain your physical strength; , tether you firmly" "Adrenaline so you don't pass out" "This is for your penis, But we'll get to it later (Harmony)" "The scalpel, it's for your eyelids , I can't help but close my eyes for your fu cking." He dismembered the enemy, 25 yuan, believe me, the victim must not have missed a single process, and when his head was finally cut off, he must still be alive to hear Clyde whispering in his ear. God, 25 yuan, how cruel! You look at us, that is, pouring lighter oil to ruin your appearance, you have been a sex slave for two years, stabbing you seven or eight times with passion, or giving Zhang a train ticket, what Sheldon did in a democratic and legal society like ours It is simply outrageous and unimaginable!
but I like it.
I insist that all crimes committed by human beings are the fault of society: if justice can be done, if grievances can be washed away, if justice can be achieved, and if there is injustice, who wants to do it by themselves? But if we get this far, we have the right to do it ourselves.
I don't like the ending of the movie, because Nick and the others played hooligans and executed Clyde privately. The story started so well, but it was anticlimactic. Maybe I have a problem with extremes, but I think it was originally a very good movie, but it was forced to be made into a main theme movie, which made me a little disappointed by the black-bellied young man who was looking forward to the hero's big fight. The revolution is not complete. what.
But don't worry, just click here.
We should think a little, or rather, some people should think more. If social justice is merely shelved, if the law and fairness are frequently trampled on, and the dissatisfaction and repression of ordinary people cannot be excreted, is the maintenance of stability a powerful pill to cure all ailments? Public power has lost trust, contracts or consensus between societies are no longer binding, and the simplest equality between people cannot be achieved. . . If these become the truth, do we still need others to do the so-called justice? We can only do it ourselves!
I did not accuse Sang or scolding Huai, nor did I have any intentions, nor did I have any conspiracy. It's just that I got some superficial understanding after watching the movie, and I'm not responsible for my own words. I hope we all don't go to the point where we are forced to do it ourselves!
View more about Law Abiding Citizen reviews
