Therefore, it is necessary not only to give this film a star, but also to raise the star rating for recognized bad films such as "The Promise" and "Super Typhoon", so as to ensure the gold content of this one-star, so as to be worthy of this movie. Because bad movies are just bad shots (not to mention the many joys they bring to us), and the better the shots, the worse they are, because they don’t deserve to exist at all. They make movies more and more (the director is right Spectator and spectator to spectator) quiz.
I don't agree with many one-star film critics here saying that watching movies is for fun, but I think the two elements of a good movie-telling a good story and telling a good story-this movie is indeed completely irrelevant. Playing this kind of virtual and real flower work is really proof of the director's poor skills.
Regrettably, too many directors now enjoy not telling a good story, but deliberately overwhelming the audience intellectually; and too many audiences no longer enjoy listening to the story, but instead relying on their intelligence. A rival director. It seems to be tit-for-tat, but in fact the two love each other.
Well, you guys enjoy your quiz. If you don't want to call it a quiz, then call it basketball, potato, whatever, as long as you don't call it a movie.
View more about Mulholland Drive reviews
