Time, life, money, time and life are indivisible things in the traditional human concept, and when money is equated with this thing, it should be a very good concept, but it is a pity that IN TIME puts this The concept was wasted. We have always thought that the passage of life is like a river that can only flow forward, and that the river can never flow backwards. Time will only go by one minute by one, and it can never be filled. But if you instill the concept of money into it, everything is different. What is time, what is the state of time, how do we use time, how do we survive in the box of time, how do we disappear at the same time as time passes. The same is true for life and money in it. Time, life, money, alone can make countless outstanding movies. And when I saw IN TIME combining these three things, I was full of excitement. I don't know if my expectations were too high. I was really disappointed with IN TIME. In fact, the filming of IN TIME is not bad. I also understand that a Hollywood movie should have the elements of Hollywood. The selling point, commercial considerations, and observability are all inseparable. However, I can't bear to want me to see such a brilliant concept so wasteful. At least, can the film be made more complete? The propositions in the film: anti-capitalist, hatred of the rich, justice, desire, unfair persecution, unparalleled resources, secret conspiracy system, etc., not only lack of details , Thin and weak, but also very piled up. I won’t talk about other things, just talk about the anti-capitalist and conspiracy system. In the movie, the protagonist saves the rich man who came out of the rich area to find his death by karma. From the rich man’s mouth, he discovers the injustice of the world and the system controlled by the rich. , After that, a series of anti-capitalist actions were launched. The enthusiasm of the anti-capitalists is insufficient, and the details of the life of the poor under the persecution of the rich are insufficient. They cannot achieve a mass anti-capital activity. Only the protagonist is the Robin Hood-style distribution of money, and the masses just take money greedily. , Can not experience a revolutionary enthusiasm. What about the system of the rich? It just simply said that because of human desire, everyone wants to live forever in order to be an exploitative system. Can only three sentences express the deepest desire of human beings? Not to mention the flimsy expression of desire, there can be many arguments in terms of the reasons. Imagine if we humans all over the world have the consumption power of Americans and the earth’s resources are limited, I can’t say 50 Human beings will run out of resources on the earth and come to the end of extinction in the next year. The accumulation of wealth on a few people has its advantages. I say this seems to be very cool, and I don't want to agree with this concept, but the rationale does have something worth thinking about. IN TIME is the lack of a piece of soil for us to think deeply. To do this kind of soil, details are indispensable. There is a saying in the "naked marriage age" that says: "All love is ultimately lost to the details. 'IN TIME also lost in it.
You can say that it is not important to have no thoughtful soil. Watching movies is entertaining and good-looking, but IN TIME also does not do enough in this regard. It is a type of police chasing, without wits, no excellent layout, and action scenes. It's not necessarily good-looking either. The story lacks a climax, and there is no twisting bridge position, which makes it lack of tension and tension. I can only say that IN TIME is like a rocking board lacking a fulcrum, a field collapsed on the ground, nothing unusual.
View more about
In Time reviews
