If the director is a chef, the film is his meal. Some are desserts, which are luscious and delicious; some are stews, which are greasy and greasy; some are salads, which are refreshing and invigorating; some are just chaotic noodles and warm water, which are bland and tasteless. The dishes that chefs are generally good at are relatively fixed, and you can know his style just by tasting. After tasting the dish "Mulholland Road", I know that the style of the chef David Lynch is not my favorite. To put it simply: the
chaotic plot is interspersed with the chaotic order of cooking. Before the oil is heated, the MSG salt and salt are poured into it first, and the main ingredients are not ready yet. The opening of a car accident is very Hitchcock's characteristics, frustration + huge sums of money is a good way to suspense. Following a dialogue at a restaurant, a man seemed nervous and said that he had found something terrible in his dream; a director was forced to choose a heroine and found out his wife was infidelity; the director went bankrupt; the director went to a certain mountain to meet someone. The light bulb flickered like that, and the lens of this light bulb was given many times, and it was only later that I realized that this might be a hint of dreams. The first part of the movie was spent without thinking. Some people may say that this is called suspense, so this is not the suspense that I understand. Huge money has no head and tail, amnesia has no head and tail, and the weird behind the wall has no head and tail. Even the aunt is a virtual dream. The most ridiculous thing is that the theater performance and the blue square box have no head and tail. The plot about killing three people in a row does not have the black humor at the beginning and the end, but putting it in the plot is like drinking cold water and stuffing the teeth. It is uncomfortable without quenching the thirst, and it is counterproductive.
Describing dreams is to serve the story, but the film is large in length as a dream telling. The suspense is only realized by a dream, which is really a bit of a poor skill.
I didn't read other people's comments. I only saw comments on this film in David Lynch's encyclopedia as a reflection of the director's impression of Hollywood. The headless boss controlled Hollywood and vented his anger by smashing a car with a golf club. It is unattractive to tell that a certain director broke up a certain couple of movie stars. If a certain director broke up a certain pair of gays, it would be a literary art. It would be maverick, and it would be profound! ? It seems that David Lynch himself used his literary style to make a surrealist accusation. Isn't he the ridiculous pseudo-literary art?
Giving two stars is all because the action of smashing the car is more chic, otherwise one star is not qualified.
View more about Mulholland Drive reviews
