Before going to the cinema, I heard that cars2 was called the "Waterloo" of pixar, and I was a little surprised and a little scared.
Looking at the negative reviews, it is roughly the opinion that Racing 2 has lost the usual humanistic feelings of pixar and has become a purely commercial Disney blockbuster. I agree with this point of view. Racing 2 is neither profound nor sensational, it has no intention of impressing or educating anyone, it is pure and clean entertainment.
But I still think Racing 2 is still wonderful. I even think that using a real person to act is a Hollywood action blockbuster. How deep and sincere does a cartoon need to carry? I don't need it to tell me a truth, to pretend to be warm and let me comprehend and think about life. I just need some pure and beautiful joy, plus a little bit of warmth, and nothing else. What's more, pixar's attitude towards 3D is also sincere. No matter the big scene or the small details, it can be called a big production, and its 3D effect is rare in many 3D cartoons. The level of sophistication of the scenes in London, Paris, and Italy was a bit unexpected to me.
I remember an interesting point of view, that when people live a happy and stable life, they prefer tragedy; and when people's life is difficult and difficult, they often use comedy to release the depression in their hearts, and pin some fantasies that have not been lost. I think most of us need the second. If you really need to think about something, why put it in a small cartoon, why not dig out a lot of niche literary films?
If toys make you nostalgic, walle makes you happy, and cars make you relaxed, then it's not a bad movie, everyone can get what they want.
PS. Jiqing is indeed something to watch... um (adults are evil in their hearts, children don't know what they are laughing at, so they have to laugh along...)
View more about Cars 2 reviews
