However, there are two adaptations that are undoubtedly inappropriate, destroying the rigor and realm of the original work. First, the Pope's chamberlain took the initiative to ask the heroine to check the diary of the murdered scientist, but did not take any measures, which directly led to her exposure. Second, in the original book, the Pope's inner servant is a man who pursues and believes in. At the end, he still speaks generously after being exposed, and finally learns that he is the son of the Pope, who was produced through test-tube technology. In a sense, he was originally a product of science. , and he committed the crime of killing his father, which shook his belief in pursuit, broke his last psychological defense, and committed suicide in front of the public believers. However, I wonder if the movie took into account the factors of the Holy See in reality, and deleted such a plot and changed it to the Pope's inner servant to commit suicide directly in fear of crime, which made him a pure conspirator and destroyed the fullness of the characters to a large extent. , reducing the depth of the original work on the relationship between science and religion.
Therefore, the movie can only be given four stars, but it is still a good movie overall. I recommend everyone to watch it. It is best to watch it after reading the original book.
View more about Angels & Demons reviews
