edge ball

Dariana 2022-01-31 08:05:59

The sex scene in the les film is inevitable. I don't know if it's because of the grading or other issues. This film doesn't even have a dew point, which makes me such a lustful girl who is waiting to see warm sex. All the sex scenes are foreplay, and the lingering time is very short, as if the child is especially afraid of seeing bad scenes, it means to dodge. It's a borderline ball.
Second, the film is about the love between teachers and students, but it does not show the necessary taboos between teachers and students. It is only an introduction to encounters, hooking up, and being secretly filmed. Both the beginning and the end are involved, but they do not run through the entire film. This brings me to "Notes on Scandal", in which the sense of taboo is expressed much better. If it is said that what the film wants to express is not taboo but warmth, then it must be as warm as possible. Non-taboo, non-warm, nondescript, how can it not be reduced to mediocrity.
Thirdly, the montage of the film is too bad. It is simple and straightforward. There is no turbulence or suspense. Like a soap opera, you can see the beginning and guess the end. There is no joy or heartache in the whole film. It is the feeling of the audience watching the performance while the actors are speaking their lines, and there is no sense of being integrated into the film.
Fourth, the connection at the film is too rough. In the part where jack and catherine quarreled inexplicably, they said they were going to break up. Please, do you have to give up so easily just because you are in a different place? Is it impossible? Is it sincere? Can the director not give such a shoddy excuse for the length of the film to perfunctory? When catherine came back from the party, she brought the man back, and Jack also slept with the boy later. Are they all going to get straight? Especially the part of jack and the boy is very nonsensical, and the length in the middle of the film increases but does not increase the abundance. Is the director trying to use this paragraph to illustrate the fact that jack is BI?
The highlight of the film lies in the faces of the heroines, there is no doubt about this, but the failure is also in the actors, and the actors' acting skills. The director has sent idols to play, right? Or is the lack of familiarity between the actors leading to a very low degree of fit? Actors are very lacking in eye contact and lack of atmosphere control. When quarreling, they are not tense enough, but when they are warm, they are alienated. Even when he needed to cry, Jack just held his face and closed his eyes without tears. Please, can't the director ask for NG? Can you get through this shit?
At the end, I was a little touched. When they parted, they had sex again, which was another highlight.
Overall, this film is a big, big edge ball, trying to show everything but not showing anything.

View more about Bloomington reviews

Extended Reading

Bloomington quotes

  • Wade: Perceptual cent... Can't believe you actually STUDY in college.

  • [Catherine has Jackie in bed seducing her for the first time]

    Catherine: Are you okay?

    Jackie: Yeah.

    Catherine: You sure? Have you ever done this before?

    Jackie: Yeah.

    Catherine: You have?

    Jackie: Once, I think.

    Catherine: You think?

    Jackie: Yeah, but I'm not supposed to say who with. She's on TV and famous now.