In the 39 years when World War II could break out at any time, Britain insisted on a policy of appeasement against fascist Germany in order to maintain its own peace and tranquility. The story begins with the death of a parliamentarian who opposed appeasement (seemingly Suicide), from the heroine's point of view, the cause of death is that the opposition in the government, which is the faction of appeasement, wants to destroy him. She accidentally discovered the evidence behind this incident, and as the story progresses , the participants in the matter are revealed little by little, that is, her family, from her close brother, to her beloved father, to her sister, and more, that is to say - her family. Yu At the same time, when she learned a little bit about the reasons behind her death, her friends who were involved in the truth, knowing or having the possibility of knowing, all died one after another ("suicide" or murdered). She did not Died, according to her father, because the family still loved her, but the family's political beliefs were against her, and they knew that she couldn't stand on the same line as the family, so they had to imprison her. In the end she ran away and let her go or her mother, but more like her father, from a kind of love between relatives who coexisted with political beliefs.
I actually liked this movie very much.
From a story point of view It's really quite a story! It has a lot of plot.
From the perspective of the screenwriter and director, the story is woven just right, there is no stupid screenwriter who guesses the ending and the plot of the story after reading the beginning, and it attracts the audience appropriately. Watch slowly, because you want to understand how the story unfolds; it is also very appropriate to control the speed of the plot, such as the density of unraveling suspense, very appropriate, don’t fast forward, and just don’t need to rewind it. Look again and again.
From an actor's point of view, I think the heroine Anna is really the perfect candidate for this role! She has played "Love in Paradise", and she can express that kind of very dramatic character to the fullest. The so-called "drama" It is precisely one of the important characteristics of Anna's character.
From the scenery in the story, it is definitely a kind of visual enjoyment. It gives people a taste of the fresh natural scenery of the United Kingdom, the very elegant and delicate countryside, and the gloomy but heavy London scenery is interspersed. I like it very much The meticulous elements in the film are very elegant, especially these scenery, they obviously exist to set off the atmosphere. And this approach to giving the audience a "clean" and "sophisticated" feeling is generally not possible. Wrong.
Another layer of delicacy is their clothes, especially Anna's clothes, which I really like. I want to say, these clothes are definitely contrary to the style of that era, a kind of thirties in today's aesthetics But this idea is understandable. After all, the movie is not a complete restoration of history, but more of a "sense of history". In this regard, I think "Glory 39 Years" and "A Generation of Pride Horses" are very different. There is one thing in common.
A little criticism:
In fact, I think the narrative mode of the movie has a beginning and an end. First of all, the movie itself is a fragmentary narrative. It is possible to spontaneously tell a certain story without the beginning. It shows the life of a certain group of people in a certain period of time. Secondly, as far as this movie is concerned, the actors who acted are really unpretentious. In terms of non-sense, the plot doesn't match, and there is no aftertaste. It's
a bit more personal.
I think I was frightened by this story! Because the story is not just about the story, the story is history, this story is more like a story based on A kind of obscure and small perspective way is telling a kind of history (the so-called story also has a double meaning in the dictionary). History is not really a past that has nothing to do with today's people. Touching people is that kind of universal Value exists beyond the boundaries of time, beyond national boundaries or ideology.
What I want to say is that politics is really a terrible thing. Going in and mixing it up? That is playing with fire! Sometimes, it is safer not to be a heroine, because if you think about it carefully, why bother? If you die, why should you be like that? In this world, many things are unclear. If you have to explain clearly, there will be bad consequences. Sometimes people should live a little more foolishly and simply, Don't always explore, and don't always want to seek the so-called justice. In addition, I will never become a member of the heroine's family, and become an unscrupulous political actor. I think we are sometimes forced to become that fertile Special (the storyteller), forced to do something, but beyond that, it is political, dangerous and scary.
View more about Glorious 39 reviews
