The lineup of this film is quite strong, with big names such as Reynolds and Lawrence Fishburne joining in, but only 88 minutes of non-fiction films were made? how is this possible?
Before watching the film, I told the MM who invited me to watch the film, this film is not easy to understand, hehe, I also listened to people casually at that time. Sure enough, MM was disturbed by the normal bloody scene inside, how could he have the heart to analyze the plot, haha.
At the end, the director specially arranged for the boss of the security company to say an ordinary but meaningful line to the protagonist with a complex expression: "Let's discuss the reward for you", what is "reward", you can also understand it as Divide the spoils! ? You can also understand it as the boss's "see through but helpless", huh, combined with the robbers who planned this robbery so confidently before and surprisingly smooth in the implementation process, only one person has the right to make this happen. Coupled with the personal legend of the boss revealed from the robbers shortly at the beginning of the film, all kinds of signs add up to make one have to wonder whether the head of the security company has worked with the robbers Mark and his gang to plan and stage an internal and external echo.” What is the truth, you can grasp it for yourself...
Recently, there have been many good films about bank robberies, so I will review them here:
"The Robber in the City", Ben Afroett, handsome guy, showing the brilliance of human nature;
"The Robber", The robbery technique and skills are fully demonstrated, and the movie is as cruel as reality;
"The Great Robbery", a Norwegian blockbuster, is as real as a documentary, with a different feeling, which is awe-inspiring!
View more about Armored reviews
