This film is a typical French romantic comedy. The plot is a little old-fashioned and it is easy to guess. The popular French teenager Romain Darius, who is a professional digger, is still far from the acting of a superstar. The heroine Vanessa Paradis It's a pity to have a flat chest, and the ending is as happy as other fake boyfriend and girlfriend films. Although the actors' performances are not very good, they are quite satisfactory. The dialogue design is good, and the plot is weaker, so I give it to three and a half stars. Juliet finally chooses to be a runaway bride like Maggie in "Runaway Bride". In the film, it seems to be largely because of her own fear of the siege of marriage, not mainly because of Alex's personal charm and various designs.
This shows the most controversial point of this film: of course, innocent and lovely girls should keep their eyes open to discern JP, but how others should help and how not to help is a big problem. As a long-standing reserved topic in the "Parents Are Bane" group, most parents have absolutely good intentions, but the means and results are diametrically opposite.
We have shouted that minors have privacy rights and various rights are protected by law for many years, and the behavior in the film is considered to interfere without authorization by deceiving others' freedom of love and marriage? Alex's principle is that if the target is happy, he will not be the target of his attack. This puts a layer of false morality on his behavior, which looks like justice, but in fact it is only fifty steps and a hundred steps.
We can't lie to help people. Besides, what counts as happiness, whether a JP is a JP, maybe the person you want to help is a JP or you are a JP, these are all subjective. No matter how good a person's starting point is, he has no right to destroy another person's love without authorization. The best we can kindly advise is to follow the good guidance, if you have to take the non-mainstream way and do whatever you can, you must know that the reality of the cup is completely different from the movie of the laundry.
The debate on the moral level is vague and always inconclusive, but we can put ourselves in the shoes and experience the feelings of those who are poached, being followed, being investigated, and the privacy of their residences being monitored. The facts encountered are "conspiracies"... ... Anyway, I absolutely do not want to be deceived by such "good intentions" and live in false deception, and maybe one day I will find out that I have become the protagonist of XX and remain in the dark. What's more, in the film, Alex is a corner that has changed his integrity and dug for money. In reality, the variables are even more infinite and unimaginable.
Cai Kangyong said that if the means are evil, then the whole thing is doomed to be evil. Some people or organizations say that he has to resort to evil means for legitimate and beautiful goals. Never accept this statement! Once accepted, his methods will only become more and more evil, and the legitimate and beautiful goals will not be truly achieved.
This remark is aimed at this social, political and economic event. It is properly understood here, and the reason is roughly similar.
The above comments seem a bit too serious for an entertaining romantic comedy. Originally, I divided the comment into two parts, the above is the first part, and the other part is the soulful literary version. There are many classic jokes in the film, but I am afraid to write too much here, so I have to end it.
Alex said that there are three types of lovers, happy, unhappy but endured, unhappy and unaware, which one do you belong to?
I hope one day I can say to the driver in the car: I just found the woman in my life... (Congratulations!) Sorry to tell you that because I have no money!
View more about Heartbreaker reviews
