I don't know how many times I've watched this movie...
just like the belief that love exists as something special and deep inside, I also believe that with certain works, some people are always better than others. It is easy to penetrate through the surface to the inside, but it is not necessarily easy to express the feeling.
There are also some works, you can grasp exactly what they want to express without even looking at them, while some people can only convince themselves of what they see and what they believe through a lot of so-called rational analysis and inference. significance.
And a good work is that it can easily reach more and more hearts, and can be deeply understood without requiring a lot of trouble to prove it to others - what did I get through that clue, Some kind of conclusion is reached by some kind of technique.
The reason why love exists and endures is because it is in people's hearts. Once a work successfully expresses some kind of love, even if it is submerged in endless ruins, one day its light will penetrate all and reach the heart.
The example given at the beginning contains this truth. When you are faced with a "right" thing, you don't need to spend a lot of time, skill and follow theories to understand it, because the law is in your hands and you are already familiar with it.
With the accumulation of experience, the more a person thinks, grows more, and results in more results, the self-structure constructed will become more complex and difficult to fully understand and accept, and the more difficult it is for some people to understand others. In this sense, it may be called the price of growth.
Similar people are rare and perhaps the easiest to fall in love with.
At first, I wasn't really interested in the causes of homosexuality. Whether it's nature or nurture, it doesn't really matter. The innate does not necessarily cannot be changed, and the acquired does not necessarily need to be changed. But there are still some emotions that drive me to think.
All kinds of theories make sense, and what I believe is that I was formed the day after tomorrow.
Maybe some kind of accidental and irreversible choice had an impact on me, and with this choice as the core and foundation, a set of self-structure was constructed. Once a choice is made and a structure is formed, it is difficult to change. It's just as difficult for a right-handed person to turn into a left-handed person, or to ask a masculine-minded person to be spontaneous, lasting, and enjoyable to wear women's clothing for everyday life.
I don't know when that choice was made. The film also doesn't make it clear whether such an option exists, and whether it actually works.
But the experience is the same, or the experience feels the same.
The lack of identification with the father image, similar to the father image but not so formal as a lighthearted and cheerful, supplemented by the same-sex elder image in the moral and ethical ambiguity, brings about a kind of spiritual connection, immersed in happiness, excitement and joy. In the state, and there is unreserved physical contact....
People who have experienced this kind of experience, the need for love is mostly directed to the same sex, even if the later peers did not bring security, satisfaction, and dedication Happiness can still awaken the pure feeling at the beginning.
That pure feeling has a kind of beauty that symbolizes love, and the above, this movie presents it.
The basis of this presentation is actually an unconditional, or 'transcending' state. A man experiencing war and a little boy, or the so-called male elders and juniors in ancient Greece, the exchange between them is beyond the homogeneous exchange.
Men give a committed, deep, lofty love, while boys give a kind of like-purified, pure, uncontaminated, reminiscence love. These two kinds of love are different from the love exchange between adults. We cannot choose what we give and what we get, but we can choose whether to accept or not. And the giving and receiving between them just happens to enrich each other's hearts.
Sometimes I wonder, how much has the world changed? What is the difference between people's development since people recorded in writing thousands of years ago to the present?
Emotionally, there is no difference. The basic emotions of happiness, anger, sadness, joy and fear have their own manifestations in different dynasties and periods. People face different worlds and social situations in different historical periods, and they are just a mixture of those emotions.
The only difference is that the material carrier that makes us generate emotions has changed. The so-called rich development of scientific literature is only constructed and expressed in different forms on one basis.
And these increasingly rich and complex things are absorbed in the infinitely possible (hypothetical) brain and limited life time of human beings, which will inevitably lead to the diversification of the overall structure of "human beings", which will inevitably make mature individuals Feeling more and more deeply lonely.
The solution to this loneliness is love.
No matter what kind of love. As long as it is love, there is a foundation, that is tolerance and understanding. And love is the infinite end point of those emotions we can experience that have not changed since ancient times.
We may not be able to understand and understand each other because of what we are after, but just stop and look at the nature of what we are after - whether we are after material or spiritual: honor, belonging, achievement , happiness, joy, is a higher form of emotional experience. And this kind of emotional experience is not only achieved through the only way to conflict with the other party.
There are countless ways in which we experience emotions and experience love.
Look at the essence, love to think, maybe because of this.
And the so-called homosexuality, the so-called cross-gender love, even if you can't understand it, you can definitely do it, you don't need to eliminate them, hurt them, reject or suppress their needs to make your love come true.
At least no matter what happens, I'm going to let myself remember that.
View more about For a Lost Soldier reviews
