The only star actor in the film is John Cusack, who barely counts as the lead in terms of play. The scenes of these four live treasures are relatively average, and even the most 250 Lu scenes have more scenes. The two scenes of flushing away the squirrel with vomit and pretending to lick the sperm are even more difficult to forget. It can be said that none of the four protagonists is likable. It is estimated that the producers feel that this sci-fi theme cannot attract female audiences anyway.
When I watched this film, I was always struggling, hoping that the protagonists would make some changes in the future by virtue of their bravery, sincerity, or kindness, etc., but I knew that if that was the case, it would definitely be a cliché. As a result, the film really didn't do what I wanted. After doing everything in a mess, I did get a good life, but the way turned out to be the most shameless cheating in "Back to the Future 2". Even what I hoped most, a few people's wish to keep the hotel waiter's arm out of kindness failed to come true, and when the arm fell, they were still a little excited.
Out of my preference for time travel themes, every time a new film is released, I still watch it, like "Hot Questions About Time Travel", like "Hot Tub Time Machine", but what I get is often chaos and disappointment , both in terms of structural creativity and emotional connotation. It is no wonder that even the idea of his own son sending his father to protect his mother came up, which was really difficult for the screenwriters later. Are time and space movies really out of words?
View more about Hot Tub Time Machine reviews