Compared with Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven directed by SCOTT, a small Robin Hood always makes me feel unhappy, as if someone fanned you a lukewarm fire, no matter how you can't burn a prairie prairie, maybe Taking the grass-roots people's life as the main line is not very similar to SCOTT's depiction style. The mixture of various elements always makes people feel a sense of contrived, and it feels that SCOTT blindly pulls the grass-roots family and the religious teachings of the country's survival and death. Putting it together, it is a bit pretentious, that is, it is not high enough to be low, and what floats in the air without a sense of support is the precarious SCOTT that wants to convey the relationship between the ruler and the subject (subject) and the relationship between father and son. It may be shocking always. The big scene, the cruelty of the war, the people struggling to survive under the exploitation of the country's lonely and tyrannical rule, and the relatives facing separation and separation, such a scene can be very atmospherically rendered to the restless heart of the audience, so SCOTT wants to use this artery to give The grass-roots family sends a little heroic blood, but the grass-roots heritage is too strong for this momentum. On the one hand, the pastoral style of life and love breeds to the point, so I can't figure it out. Yes, SCOTT portrayed the deep love and longing for the return of an ordinary man hidden behind the fate of a country in Gladiator very emotionally. It can be said to be quite successful. What came was a struggle against human nature behind the so-called Divine Crusade. A man looking for redemption redeemed an ancient city and its people with the simplest and most difficult will of honoring God, but in Robin Hood, I can't see it. In such a clear picture, what I see is a kind of east and west, the battle lines in the gladiators and the tyrants lead the power struggle, and the religious teachings in the kingdom of heaven. In fact, the convergence of these two elements is a so-called The holiday is a strong blockbuster, but SCOTT may want to show warmth and restore the simple British rural life and love in the war, but injects the heroic blood of the whole film into the vulgar skin. I remember there was a scene where Robin's buddies were looking for girls in a bar, and one of them said to the other, you know what, the best way to get girls is to start with the least beautiful one, and then I thought Nash's blond beauty theory in Beautiful Mind, and then I became petrified and speechless. SCOTT may also have good intentions and challenge breakthroughs, and wants to bring a little modern cultural flavor to cater to the young public, but maybe his insight is also the human nature in the political mountains and rivers of the country and the country, and he deviates too much from the things that are too folk-customized. So it is such a big mixed movie, just like the chef fry a table of mixed flavors, there are
Of course, many of the camera angles and images presented in SCOTT's film are very attentive and successful, such as the slow motion of Robin's bow and arrow at the end, and the cartoon-like jungle that jumps before and after the film. RUSSELL is still handsome and sexy. Hahaha. Eyes, warm but firm eyes are very important. The heroine is a ballerina in Benjamin Button. She is soft and strong, and her strong and brave character is well interpreted by her. In short, if you watch this film in the spirit of entertainment, it is because the elements are very concentrated. It depends on which target group you are in. I muttered that I would do it from the perspective of gladiators and the Kingdom of Heaven. Maybe the requirements are too far-fetched. , Hahaha, okay~ The benevolent sees the benevolence, the wise sees the wisdom, the feedback of the film to everyone is different, the main thing is that if you have the same feeling, it will be rubbed into your heart, and then you will feel good when you walk out of the theater.
View more about
Robin Hood reviews
