I would like to comment on this film with another "Sixth Day" filmed earlier.
If one day, someone who is exactly like you appears, everyone you know will know, except for yourself, who can distinguish you in this world? ? ? ?
Asked the last question from another angle, now why are you so sure that you are not the cloned one? ? ? ?
The last question goes a little deeper to ask, who am I? ? ? ?
who am I? I am a living organism with a continuous memory. Apart from that, nothing can confirm my identity.
It is memory that guarantees that we wake up every morning and know who we are, what we should do, what we should not do, who we like and who we hate.
Memory is the source of all our experience values and worldviews. All our creative and critical thinking and actions are based on our memory and interpretation of memory.
Therefore, the cloned me and the original me are both me. No one is more real to me.
This answer seems a bit frustrating, because being unique and unparalleled in the world was once a natural privilege for everyone.
If one day memories can be transplanted, human beings will be their own gods.
God only created human flesh in his own image. Human beings are more bull than God, and human beings created themselves.
So one day, when cloning and memory transplantation technologies mature, will each of us inevitably face identity confusion or loss of uniqueness?
Now add the soul factor to consider.
What is the soul? This question is too complicated. My simple understanding is that the soul is first transcendent, and secondly the soul is immortal.
Transcendent confirms that it exists beyond our experience and is not proven by our experience.
Some people may ask, how can human beings know if they are all transcendents, and how can I believe things that are not proven.
It sounds like it's like someone said to you one day that there are six-winged angels in the world, but he can neither feel nor prove it.
But what we cannot prove and cannot feel must not exist? At least it is possible.
Now I want to discuss the soul through the topic of memory transplantation.
First of all, what is the relationship between soul and memory?
The second question is, what is the relationship between the soul and "me"?
Because only memory can identify a person, there is an independent person if there is an independent memory.
The traditional view is that everyone has their own unique soul, but what about the situation of the two mes in the movie?
I remember when I read "The Utopia", Plato believed that every object in the world has a corresponding idea.
This idea is the most real existence, and every existence in the world is an imitation of the world of ideas.
For example, for a table, there is a corresponding table concept in the sky.
Later, in the "History of Western Philosophy," Russell questioned that the concept of this theory was too vague and unacceptable.
Still taking the table as an example, the table in the world corresponds to the concept of a table, and it seems that there is no problem.
However, do all the tables in the world correspond to the concept of a unique table, or the concept of different tables?
If you create a new table, did humans do something that only God can do, and create an idea in heaven?
So what does a table lacking a corner correspond to, a broken concept? Or is it the idea of a table with missing corners?
I repaired a broken table, did I repair a heavenly idea?
I want to discuss the soul through this question about the table concept.
Everyone in the world corresponds to a unique "small" soul, or does all people correspond to a unique "big" soul that is indistinguishable?
If each person corresponds to a unique soul, was the soul of the cloned person created?
Of course, there is also the possibility that people who are cloned have no soul at all.
Just as memory is considered to be a specific arrangement of neurons in the brain, and the body is no more than a bunch of carbohydrates, where does our sacredness come from?
Then the only explanation that clones have no soul is because the original me was created directly by God, and the clone is just a copycat version of "I".
Now it's also involved in creationism, which is another extremely complicated issue.
If everyone corresponds to a unique soul, there is no "my" soul and "his" soul, only "our" soul exists.
I think the soul can be compared to a TV signal transmitter. Every body is a TV set and can use it to receive signals.
Then the created person should have a soul.
Whether the body is eliminated or produced has no effect on the soul, because the presence or absence of the TV has nothing to do with the TV signal.
The TV signal itself has always existed forever, just as the soul is immortal.
If the above statement is true, then the uniqueness of humans does not exist, and a higher existence, immortal existence will be replaced.
In this existence, everyone is equal, because every one of me is you, you are me, and at the same time there is no me and no you.
View more about Moon reviews
