first sentence: Fortunately I started watching the
second sentence . The second sentence: Are you sure this was directed by Tim Burton?
From the second Batman, I can be regarded as faithful. But I don’t think that everything was done well, you can check my previous reviews. The
reason why I watched this one is because one day, I discussed a movie with an old American, and then we have the best BATMAN movie, Which one is not good.
So he asked me suddenly: You prefer Jack Nicholson's JOKER or Heath Ledger's?
My conclusion... I told him that I hadn't read the first one.
Then he said: Oh~You' d better to watch it. And then we talk about it.
So I followed the instructions .
So I got the above two sentences.
It's really not like Tim Burton's thing, it's much worse than the second... . I’m not talking about special effects. It’s a long time.
I’m talking about the lens. Tim Burton’s scenes have always been more fantastic, like the second Batman Return.
Well... The first part is really like other directors. It doesn't have that fantastic feeling at all... and personally feel that the plot is not very coherent, I can only say that the script is not well arranged.
If I were to start From the first one, then maybe I won't watch the follow-up of BATMAN at all, maybe just pick one or two to look at.
But I watched step by step from the second part, and the second part was very successful in attracting me, so I watched all the BATMAN. Because the second part is really good, all the BATMAN 6 parts let me In row 123, the first place is Batman Returns, the second place is The Dark Knight, and then Batman Forever.
The supporting roles in BATMAN movies are always better than the protagonist.
Like Michelle Pfeiffer and Danny De Vito in Batman Returns, you can also say It's evenly split with the protagonist, but Michelle Pfeiffer is slightly better. Not
to mention Heath Ledger and Jim Carry in Batman Forever, which completely stole the limelight.
Okay, return to the keyword THE JOKER.
To be honest, Ha, I still prefer Heath Ledger’s JOKER. It’s
not that Jack Nicholson’s is bad, but that his is more in line with the DC original and the JOKER in the animation. He is just a mentally mad criminal.
And Heath Ledger’s JOKER is his own JOKER, is his own renewal The interpretation of JOKER. It is even more unpredictable, more frightening, and a completely neurotic genius.
Madness and neuroticism are completely different things.
Jack Nicholson's JOKER's remarkable clip After they entered the museum with their group, Jack Ordered the entourage to play music and began to dance by himself. This is really a clown, which is in line with the clown of DC, but not neurotic enough, because you can still understand that he wants to destroy this place.
And JOKER of Heath Ledger, when he put his half body sideways When you stretch out the car window and show his smiling face in the face of the roaring night wind, you have no idea what he is thinking or what he is going to do...Unpredictability has always been a weakness that has always been inexplicably fearful.
Heath Ledger got it.
Well... if you are a fan of BATMAN, then you are still worth seeing~
View more about Batman reviews
