The changes in the movie are okay. Although some plots have been deleted and many plots have been added, in general this is a movie suitable for people with logical thinking. If you have read the original book, you will know it How difficult to understand the logic of the story, it can even be said that it is an illogical novel, the whole story of the matter has nothing to do with it. Movies are meant to be watched by the public, and they need public understanding. For example, when I watched the "Miss Julie" in a foreign literature class recently, I abruptly didn't understand what it was trying to convey from the beginning to the end. I have doubts about my own IQ, because the whole class is watching it quietly...
Ordinary people (or ordinary girls) will like that cute robot with depression, Marvin, and I naturally do, this role is successful It failed again, and its success lies in the fact that it aroused the overflowing motherhood and sympathy of the majority of female friends, making it almost overwhelm the protagonist in the film. Its failure lies in the fact that the author wanted to create a very typical attractive Thoughtful and modern character, but it has become a funny little guy~~ things are always so unpredictable.
The Seattle Times commented on the film that "While perfectionists will see the film as a departure from the book, the film has the British humor in the book quite intact" Well, well said, British humor is always so It's hard to prevent, such as the host who was pumping for a cup of tea at a critical moment, the sperm whale and morning glory that fell from the sky, the closed planet that never forgets to advertise, and of course, the classic line of Pony Ma -
"I Trying to talk to the host."
"What did he say?"
"He doesn't like me."
Oh, come on, if you want to think about a movie like a "deep", you don't want to watch it like a "deep" Animate it.
42? Magical numbers.
View more about The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy reviews
